2007
DOI: 10.2325/jbcs.14.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False-positive and false-negative cases of fine-needle aspiration cytology for palpable breast lesions

Abstract: Palpable breast tumors can be definitively diagnosed based on a combination of physical examination, radiological studies and FNA, when the radiological studies concur with the diagnosis by FNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fine needle Aspiration Cytology has been proved to be a highly efficacious method in diagnosis of palpable breast lesion in our study. The sensitivity of 98.07% and specificity of 100% obtained in our study were in accordance to sensitivity of 86-99% and specificity of 92-100% reported in various studies (Jayaram et al, 1996;Rubin et al, 1997;Argia et al, 2002;Hussain, 2005;Muhamed et al, 2005;Ishikawa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fine needle Aspiration Cytology has been proved to be a highly efficacious method in diagnosis of palpable breast lesion in our study. The sensitivity of 98.07% and specificity of 100% obtained in our study were in accordance to sensitivity of 86-99% and specificity of 92-100% reported in various studies (Jayaram et al, 1996;Rubin et al, 1997;Argia et al, 2002;Hussain, 2005;Muhamed et al, 2005;Ishikawa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…False-negative and false-positive results occur due to physician experience 16,17 , sample quality 18 and certain histopathology diagnoses 19 . Using ultrasound guided FNAC increases specifi city and sensitivity of FNA 20,21 . False-positive and false-negative results can mislead clinicians and therefore FNA should not be used as the only diagnostic tool in diff erential diagnosis of breast tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include: (1) technical difficulties where the smears are limited by cellularity or obscured by drying artifact and or blood, (2) inexperience or unfamiliarity of the pathologist with the cytologic features of breast FNAs and (3) the overlap of cytologic features of certain benign and malignant conditions due to the nature of the lesion (true gray zone) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The first 2 factors have accounted for the majority (up to 80%) of C3 and C4 cases whereas the ‘true gray zone' represents a small fraction (20%) [9].…”
Section: Factors Contributing To the Indeterminate/erroneous Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less common lesions include granular cell tumor, adenomyoepithelioma, lactation- and pregnancy-related lesions, fat necrosis, inflammatory and radiation changes, adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), spindle-cell lesions and Phyllodes tumor (PT) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. …”
Section: Lesions Contributing To the Indeterminate/erroneous Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%