Family Forest Owners’ Commitment to Service Providers and the Effect of Association Membership on Loyalty

Abstract

Long-term relationships with family forest owners willing to sell roundwood are important for the Nordic forest industry. Research has shown that customer loyalty is mediated by a sense of commitment to the service provider. At least two forms of commitment have been distinguished: affective commitment in the sense of liking the provider, and calculative commitment in the sense of being dependent on the provider. In Sweden, more than one-third of family forest owners are members of a forest owners' association with the primary objective of supporting its members' profitability. The associations buy one-third of the owners' roundwood. This study examined the role of different forms of commitment in the process of becoming loyal timber suppliers, and the moderating role of membership. A questionnaire was sent to forest owners who notified the authorities of a final harvesting operation involving timber procurement by an organization. The results show that both forms of commitment significantly affected loyalty and the forms were correlated. Members of forest owners' associations who sold their timber to the association expressed higher affective commitment and loyalty than other forest owners, indicating that a sense of member involvement is important for timber procurement by the associations.

Family Forest Owners’ Perception of Management and Thinning Operations in Young Dense Forests: A Survey from Sweden

“…With this restriction, a random sample of 1000 FFOs was selected. The sample size was determined by calculating that the recommended number of responses needed for a representative sample was 384 [20,21], and then taking into account that similar surveys in Sweden have reached a response rate of 40-50% [15,22].…”

Private Forest Owner's Cooperation in Machinery Ring

“…Beach et al 2005, Rodrıguez-Vicente andMarey-Perez 2009) different characteristics influence the forest management activities of private forest owners. In addition, it is also important to consider options for long-term business cooperation between small-scale private forest owners and machinery ring members (or entrepreneurs) in the form of forest management agreement, as is already the practice in Scandinavian countries (Kurttila et al 2016, Laakkonen et al 2019, Staal Wästerlund and Kronholm 2017, as only this type of cooperation gives small-scale private forest owner the chance to overcome cost-inefficient forest management.…”

Application of Climate-Smart Forestry – Forest Manager Response to the Relevance of European Definition and Indicators

“…The twenty countries that agreed to participate distributed the survey to forest managers in both the public and private sectors within their professional networks, the most common route was to advertise in the countries forestry professionals representative body, if these did not exist then the research would use their own professional network. The aim was to receive a minimum of four responses from each country with a spread from both private and public managers, unless the country had a different mix of forest manager typologies, such as dominance of family forests (Ma et al, 2012;Wästerlund et al, 2017;Kang et al, 2019).…”