2020
DOI: 10.1192/bja.2020.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family therapy approaches for anorexia nervosa: a Cochrane Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature base for the evidence of family‐based therapy for early stage illness in adolescent AN is the longest and largest. Nevertheless, a recently updated Cochrane review (Fisher et al., 2020) concluded that the overall strength of the evidence was low to moderate. Most studies have focused on patient body mass index (BMI) at the end of treatment as the primary outcome, with less information about the rest of the family.…”
Section: The New Maudsley Model For Collaborative Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature base for the evidence of family‐based therapy for early stage illness in adolescent AN is the longest and largest. Nevertheless, a recently updated Cochrane review (Fisher et al., 2020) concluded that the overall strength of the evidence was low to moderate. Most studies have focused on patient body mass index (BMI) at the end of treatment as the primary outcome, with less information about the rest of the family.…”
Section: The New Maudsley Model For Collaborative Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the stronger recommendation to 'offer' family therapy was made by NICE for adolescent BN, on the basis of their meta-analysis of just two FT-BN studies (Le Grange et al, 2015; showing superior remission compared to individual approaches as follow-up, but not remission. The Cochrane review conducted by Fisher et al (2019) on family therapy approaches for anorexia nervosa included a number of meta-analyses, although differed from NICE in the choice of studies included in their analyses. The headline conclusion of the review was that there was low-quality evidence to support the efficacy of family therapy compared to treatment as usual in terms of remission posttreatment (based on two studies, with 81 participants), but not at follow-up.…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses of greater relevance to FT-AN were the comparisons of family therapy to psychological interventions, which also included the Lock et al (2010), Robin et al (1999) and Russell et al (1987) trials, but also included adult studies by Dare et al (2001) and Crisp et al (1991). Fisher et al (2019) found no evidence of superiority of family therapy relative to psychological interventions in terms of remission; however, there were superior outcomes for FT-AN for weight at end of treatment, although not at follow-up, which is in keeping with the findings by NICE (2017) and the meta-analysis by Murray et al (2019) which is discussed below. The authors comment on the high risk of bias found in the included studies, for instance through outcome assessment being conducted by clinicians rather than blinded assessors.…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%