2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm size and the determinants of productive efficiency in the Brazilian Center-West

Abstract: This paper explores the determinants of technical efficiency, and the relationship between farm size and efficiency, in the Center-West of Brazil. This is the region where agricultural production and total factor productivity have grown the fastest since 1970. It is also a region characterised by unusually large farms. Technical efficiency is studied with Data Envelopment Analysis and county level data disaggregated by farm size and type of land tenure. The efficiency measure is regressed on a set of explanato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
55
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic implication of these results is that- Table 4 Posterior summary, median and 95% credible intervals (in parentheses), for r 2 ; s 2 ; j ¼ s 2 =ðs 2 þ r 2 Þ and w 2 for some of the fitted models independent of the model estimated-we observe an inverse relationship between farm size and productivity only up to about 1000 ha for this type of producer in this region of Brazil. This is broadly consistent with the results in Helfand and Levine (2004) and Moreira et al (2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The economic implication of these results is that- Table 4 Posterior summary, median and 95% credible intervals (in parentheses), for r 2 ; s 2 ; j ¼ s 2 =ðs 2 þ r 2 Þ and w 2 for some of the fitted models independent of the model estimated-we observe an inverse relationship between farm size and productivity only up to about 1000 ha for this type of producer in this region of Brazil. This is broadly consistent with the results in Helfand and Levine (2004) and Moreira et al (2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We also seek to explain them. Helfand and Levine (2004) and Sampaio de Souza et al (2005) provide two examples related to municipalities in Brazil-the focus of our empirical application. Both papers first use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to estimate technical efficiency of agents in municipalities spread over a region of Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency scores are estimated in a first step, and then the scores are used as dependent variables in a second-stage regression. Examples of studies using this approach include Tauer (1993), Sharma et al (1999), Iráizoz et al (2003), Helfand and Levine (2004) and Galanopoulos et al (2006). In the first stage, the data envelopment analysis (Charnes et al, 1978), or DEA is used to estimate the farm level economic technical and allocative input efficiency scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies (Bergström 2000;Wang and Yao 2002;Helfand and Levine 2004;Angeriz et al 2006), the production value of each SME is measured by the added value generated by each unit. This variable is defined as the difference between the value of goods and services produced and the value of external acquisitions.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies are in accordance with the initial idea exposed by Caves et al (1982) and suggest that all possible bilateral comparisons among units as well as the respective geometric means must be calculated in order to compare the efficiency components of two units during the same time period. Recent studies (Helfand and Levine 2004;Angeriz et al 2006, among others) have applied this methodology and taken it one step further, by first finding the traditional Malmquist Productivity Index and its components, and then contrasting the existence of proximity effects through spatial econometric techniques. However, according to Schmidt and Moreira (2009) this double procedure does not take into account the uncertainty in the estimation of efficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%