2013
DOI: 10.5958/j.0976-4666.58.4.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmers Perception on Contract Farming of Sugarcane in Orissa: A Village Level Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pesticides are often overused with all their negative effects [12]. Rout et al [55] present the most important constraints experienced by farmers, namely, delay in payment of produce, the lack of credit for crop production, scarcity of water for irrigation, difficulty in meeting quality requirements, and lower prices of crop produce. The ranked order of farmers' perceived disadvantages of CF according to Tuyen et al [19] is the following: (1) possible late purchase and input delivery, and delays in payments; (2) reduction in the household's freedom or loss of flexibility in making decisions; (3) manipulation of agreed quotas and quality specifications; (4) possible high price of inputs; (5) monopoly exploitation; (6) unequal bargaining power between farmers and contractors; (7) may buy less of the product than the pre-agreed quantities or be rejected for not meeting required standards; (8) possible greater environmental risks; and (9) risks of indebtedness from loans and excessive advances.…”
Section: How a Cf Scheme Is Perceived?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesticides are often overused with all their negative effects [12]. Rout et al [55] present the most important constraints experienced by farmers, namely, delay in payment of produce, the lack of credit for crop production, scarcity of water for irrigation, difficulty in meeting quality requirements, and lower prices of crop produce. The ranked order of farmers' perceived disadvantages of CF according to Tuyen et al [19] is the following: (1) possible late purchase and input delivery, and delays in payments; (2) reduction in the household's freedom or loss of flexibility in making decisions; (3) manipulation of agreed quotas and quality specifications; (4) possible high price of inputs; (5) monopoly exploitation; (6) unequal bargaining power between farmers and contractors; (7) may buy less of the product than the pre-agreed quantities or be rejected for not meeting required standards; (8) possible greater environmental risks; and (9) risks of indebtedness from loans and excessive advances.…”
Section: How a Cf Scheme Is Perceived?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings revealed that participants of contract farming schemes have a better understanding of important aspects of these schemes compared to nonparticipants. In India Rout, Mishra, Bar and Mondal, (2013) explored the perceived benefits and disadvantages of Sugarcane contract farming. Their findings revealed that contract farming was hampered by many constraints namely, delay of payment of produce, lack of credit, and scarcity of water for irrigation among others.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is difficult to guarantee the implementation of contracts (Guo and Jolly, 2008; Luo et al , 2013). In addition, retailers often invest their money to compensate for the insufficient funds of producers in certain important sections, such as resource inputs (Reardon et al , 2009; Rout et al , 2013) and market access (Wang et al , 2011). This leads to the situation that retailers have a relatively more powerful position and they would share the market demand information merely out of their own interests (Xu, 2013; Lee et al , 2000), thus still putting producers at a disadvantage (Sharma, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%