Fast Power Density Assessment of 5G Mobile Handset Using Equivalent Currents Method

Wang, He; Xu, Bo; Scialacqua, L.; Ying, Zhinong; Scannavini, A.; Foged, L. J.; Zhao, Ke; Paola, Carla Di; Zhang, Shuai; He, Sailing

doi:10.36227/techrxiv.11874738.v2

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, the authors of [157] demonstrate that the minimum peak EIRP of a 5G UE with mm-Waves satisfies both ICNIRP, FCC and IEEE exposure limits. In addition, the authors of [166], [167] point out the importance of evaluating the PD in proximity to 5G UE with mm-Waves, claiming that a traditional approach based on magnitude-based field combination may led to very conservative estimation of the peak spatial-average PD. Moreover, a more accurate PD assessment, based on the magnitude and phase of the EMFs, is advocated.…”

Section: Adoption Of Frequencies In the Mm-wave Bandsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health Risks Associated With 5G Exposure: A View From the Communications Engineering Perspective

Chiaraviglio

Elzanaty²,

Alouini

2021

IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The deployment of the fifth-generation (5G) wireless communication services requires the installation of 5G nextgeneration Node-B Base Stations (gNBs) over the territory and the wide adoption of 5G User Equipment (UE). In this context, the population is concerned about the potential health risks associated with the Radio Frequency (RF) emissions from 5G equipment, with several communities actively working toward stopping the 5G deployment. To face these concerns, in this work, we analyze the health risks associated with 5G exposure by adopting a new and comprehensive viewpoint, based on the communications engineering perspective. By exploiting our background, we debunk the alleged health effects of 5G exposure and critically review the latest works that are often referenced to support the health concerns from 5G. We then precisely examine the up-to-date metrics, regulations, and assessment of compliance procedures for 5G exposure, by evaluating the latest guidelines from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as well as the national regulations in more than 220 countries. We also thoroughly analyze the main health risks that are frequently associated with specific 5G features (e.g., multipleinput multiple-output (MIMO), beamforming, cell densification, adoption of millimeter waves, and connection of millions of devices). Finally, we examine the risk mitigation techniques based on communications engineering that can be implemented to reduce the exposure from 5G gNB and UE. Overall, we argue that the widely perceived health risks that are attributed to 5G are not supported by scientific evidence from communications engineering. In addition, we explain how the solutions to minimize the health risks from 5G (including currently unknown effects) are already mature and ready to be implemented. Finally, future works, e.g., aimed at evaluating long-term impacts of 5G exposure, as well as innovative solutions to further reduce the RF emissions, are suggested.

show abstract

Section: Adoption Of Frequencies In the Mm-wave Bandsmentioning

confidence: 99%