2020
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2020.1735547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast switching behaviour and dielectric parameters of two chiral ferroelectric mesogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polar anchoring is an electrostatic interaction, while dispersive anchoring is London or van der Waals interactions between LC molecules and the anchoring surface (in our case, a polymer layer) [ 82 , 83 ]. Anchoring energy coefficients, dispersion, W d , and polar, W p , can be calculated according to the formulas [ 80 , 84 , 85 ]: where γ , d , τ , K , P s and E th are rotational viscosity, layer thickness, switching time, mean elastic constant, spontaneous polarization and threshold field for molecular reorientation, respectively. Due to the lack of the K value, it was not possible to determine the polar anchoring coefficient, W p .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polar anchoring is an electrostatic interaction, while dispersive anchoring is London or van der Waals interactions between LC molecules and the anchoring surface (in our case, a polymer layer) [ 82 , 83 ]. Anchoring energy coefficients, dispersion, W d , and polar, W p , can be calculated according to the formulas [ 80 , 84 , 85 ]: where γ , d , τ , K , P s and E th are rotational viscosity, layer thickness, switching time, mean elastic constant, spontaneous polarization and threshold field for molecular reorientation, respectively. Due to the lack of the K value, it was not possible to determine the polar anchoring coefficient, W p .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature dependence of the parallel and perpendicular permittivity’s (ε || and ε ⊥ ) and their average value ε avg = (2ε ⊥ + ε || )/3 for the (Compound A + Compound B) system is shown in Figure 4 a–c, respectively. Figure 4 b shows that ε ⊥ values peak in the SmC* phase (~19–28); this enhanced value is due to the temperature-dependent fluctuations of molecules in the direction of the phase angle of the helical structure [ 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ]. The increment of ε ⊥ is greater than ε || in the SmC* phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of P s decreases with an increase in the temperature and attains their lowest values at the SmC*-SmA* transition temperature. Spontaneous polarization reaches ~340 nC.cm −2 in the SmC A * phase (30 °C); this high value of Ps is due to the contribution from the bulky nature of the chiral unit of the compounds, large dipole moment of the ester linkage and the high (43° to 45°) tilt angle of molecules with respect to the smectic layer normal, which increases the rotational hindrance barrier [ 67 , 69 , 77 ]. On comparing the variation of molar concentration with P s of the Compound A + Compound B mixture system, P s of Compound B is ~190 nC.cm −2 (mole concentration, x = 0.0) and it increases with the increase in molar concentration of Compound A in the mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%