2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue simulation for titanium/CFRP hybrid laminates using cohesive elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burianek and Spearing found that the fatigue crack of Ti/CFRP FMLs initiated from the free edges and the area of stress concentration. According to Yamaguchi et al, the interfacial strength was a main factor in delamination and the crack propagation rate. Burianek et al predicted crack growth using the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burianek and Spearing found that the fatigue crack of Ti/CFRP FMLs initiated from the free edges and the area of stress concentration. According to Yamaguchi et al, the interfacial strength was a main factor in delamination and the crack propagation rate. Burianek et al predicted crack growth using the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High‐strength titanium (Ti) alloys exhibit high specific strength, and when combined with carbon FRP (CFRP), they were also a suitable choice in previous studies . Most studies on fatigue in Ti‐alloy‐containing FML have focused on experimental and numerical investigations of the progress of fatigue damage using single‐edge and holed specimens during fatigue loading . However, a few studies have reported on the fatigue damage evolution processes of unnotched Ti‐alloy‐containing FML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fatigue material parameters are provided inTable 5. In this table the Paris law parameters ðC; mÞ and the values for fracture energy ðG Ic ; G IIc Þ are taken from[24,25] respectively. The value of g is our assumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%