2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Dutch translation of the Anxiety, Depression And Mood Scale in older adults with intellectual disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sub‐scale's internal consistency, test–retest reliability and inter‐rater reliability are good (α = 0.88, ICC = 0.86 and ICC = 0.74) and its validity is satisfactory (sensitivity 80–82% and specificity 65–78%) in older people with ID (Hermans et al . ). The score on the general anxiety sub‐scale ranges from 0 to 21.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This sub‐scale's internal consistency, test–retest reliability and inter‐rater reliability are good (α = 0.88, ICC = 0.86 and ICC = 0.74) and its validity is satisfactory (sensitivity 80–82% and specificity 65–78%) in older people with ID (Hermans et al . ). The score on the general anxiety sub‐scale ranges from 0 to 21.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The total ADAMS has been completed for all participants, but only the score on the general anxiety subscale has been used. The internal consistency ( α = 0.88), test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.86), interrater reliability (ICC = 0.74) and validity (sensitivity 80%–82%, specificity 65%–78%) of this subscale are sufficient using a cut‐off score of ≥10 for participants with no autism and ≥14 for participants with an autistic spectrum disorder (Hermans et al ., ). In addition to the ADAMS, participants who were capable of self‐report were interviewed with the Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with an Intellectual Disability (GAS‐ID) (Mindham and Espie, ) and the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS‐A) (Zigmond and Snaith, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity and reliability of this structure was investigated in two Dutch samples, one sample older than 50 years of age (N = 198) and one adult sample below 50 years of age (N = 975), 13,15 and was found to be fair to good. The ADAMS consists of 28 items which had to be rated by one professional caregiver on a 4-point scale, ranging from never/no problem to often/severe problem.…”
Section: Mood and Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mood and anxiety were assessed using the Dutch version of the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS), 13,14 a by-proxy observational questionnaire that is specifically developed for people with ID. The ADAMS consists of 28 items which had to be rated by one professional caregiver on a 4-point scale, ranging from never/no problem to often/severe problem.…”
Section: Mood and Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation