2013
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-2-w2-59-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature-Based Quality Evaluation of 3d Point Clouds – Study of the Performance of 3d Registration Algorithms

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The production of realistic 3D map databases is continuously growing. We studied an approach of 3D mapping database producing based on the fusion of heterogeneous 3D data. In this term, a rigid registration process was performed. Before starting the modeling process, we need to validate the quality of the registration results, and this is one of the most difficult and open research problems. In this paper, we suggest a new method of evaluation of 3D point clouds based on feature extraction and compari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More in general, the evaluation of the correctness and accuracy of a point cloud can be carried out by following at least these three approaches: cloud to cloud [30], point to point [31], and cloud to feature [32,33] comparisons.…”
Section: Quantitative Criteria For the Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More in general, the evaluation of the correctness and accuracy of a point cloud can be carried out by following at least these three approaches: cloud to cloud [30], point to point [31], and cloud to feature [32,33] comparisons.…”
Section: Quantitative Criteria For the Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related works on the potential of MMS to compete with the more traditional survey techniques are taken into account, as well as the information regarding the data elaboration phase related to SLAM algorithms. An evaluation of the quality and accuracy of MMSs 3D point clouds can be found in [11][12][13]; experiences on the use of portable mapping systems combined with other survey techniques are described in [14,15]; and comparisons between SLAM surveys and TLS/photogrammetric surveys are well described in [16][17][18][19]. Additionally, more specific tests and analyses of the performance of different commercial IMMSs were performed in [20,21], and experiences in the deployment of these systems for the documentation of cultural heritage can be found in [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%