2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility preservation for men with testicular cancer: Is sperm cryopreservation cost effective in the era of assisted reproductive technology?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although similar systematic reviews have been published (Ferrari et al, ; Gilbert, Nangia, Dupree, Smith, & Mehta, ), this distinctive review focuses on the role of the healthcare provider and the healthcare system itself rather than patient‐dependent outcomes such as the use rate of frozen spermatozoa (Ferrari et al, ) or the cost‐effectiveness of fertility preservation in testicular cancer patients (Gilbert et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although similar systematic reviews have been published (Ferrari et al, ; Gilbert, Nangia, Dupree, Smith, & Mehta, ), this distinctive review focuses on the role of the healthcare provider and the healthcare system itself rather than patient‐dependent outcomes such as the use rate of frozen spermatozoa (Ferrari et al, ) or the cost‐effectiveness of fertility preservation in testicular cancer patients (Gilbert et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sibert et al [6] was reported that semen quality did not differ significantly in patients who cryopreserved sperm before or after orchidectomy. But it should preferably be performed before orchiectomy [7]. Also, in young boys who was performed orchiectomy and planned to chemotherapy, testicular tissue cryopreservation may be preferred [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,[56][57][58][59][60][61] Machen ve ark.nın çalışmalarındaki %1,5'lik sperm kullanma oranı ABD'deki diğer çalışmalarda %5-10 arasında bildirilmiştir. [10,32,62] Japonya'da 695 enstitüyü içeren bir araştırmada spermleri dondurulup saklanan toplam 820 kanser olgusunda sperm dondurmanın kullanılmamasının temel sebepleri azoospermi ve kötü semen parametreleri olarak belirtilmiştir. [13] Toplam 898 kanserli olguda dondurulmuş sperm kullanma oranları ise %10,7 olarak bildirilmiştir.…”
Section: öZunclassified
“…Yine sperm saklanmasının radyoterapi ve kemoterapi öncesi testiküler sperm ekstraksiyonu (TESE) ve benzerlerine göre maliyet açısından oldukça avantajlı olduğu belirtilmiştir. [62] Dondurulup ısıtılan spermde gebelik ilk kez 1953 yılında bildirilmiştir. [66] Sperm saklanması sonrası gebelik oranları %12-35,2 arasında değişmektedir.…”
Section: öZunclassified