2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibers for hearts: A critical review on electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering

Abstract: Please cite this article as: Kitsara, M., Agbulut, O., Kontziampasis, D., Chen, Y., Menasché, P., Fibers for hearts: A critical review on electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering, Acta Biomaterialia (2016), doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10. 1016/j.actbio.2016.11.014 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
170
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
(169 reference statements)
0
170
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Technologies like electrospinning and 3D printing enable the control of these properties through optimization in the materials and processing parameters. Electrospun constructs, which consist of arranged polymeric nanofibers, have been utilized in engineering several tissue structures, including vascular grafts [17], bone [18], and myocardium [19]. Furthermore, 3D printing in scaffold design allows for the integration of features like vasculature [20, 21] and the control of scaffold architecture [22], using synthetic polymers or bioinks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies like electrospinning and 3D printing enable the control of these properties through optimization in the materials and processing parameters. Electrospun constructs, which consist of arranged polymeric nanofibers, have been utilized in engineering several tissue structures, including vascular grafts [17], bone [18], and myocardium [19]. Furthermore, 3D printing in scaffold design allows for the integration of features like vasculature [20, 21] and the control of scaffold architecture [22], using synthetic polymers or bioinks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrospinning allows control on tuning fiber thickness and composition, and the process is compatible with a broad range of polymers to support wide applications . The materials commonly utilized to fabricate electrospun nanofibrous patch for cardiac tissue engineering include synthetic (e.g., PCL, polycaprolactone; PLA, polylactic acid; PGA, polyglycolic acid; PU, polyurethanes, their co‐polymers) and natural polymers (e.g., collagen, fibrinogen, chitosan, gelatin, elastin, and silk fibers) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although synthetic polymers are preferred for electrospinning due to their cost‐effectiveness and control over fiber properties (physicochemical, degradation), they need posttreatment such as functionalization or surface‐coating as they are hydrophobic and lack biochemical cues needed for cell adhesion. They also present concerns of toxicity, bioaccumulation and immune reactions upon implantation . In contrast, natural polymers provide biochemical cues for cell adhesion and proliferation and are nontoxic and low immunogenic .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electrospinning is limited, nanofibrous structures generated by this technology gathered attention of specialists from various fields, for instance filtration [4,5], chemical catalysis [6,7], electronics and energy storage [8,9], tissue engineering [10][11][12], and the like. To overcome the low throughput of electrospinning, and provide large scale process for abovementioned specialists, various approaches have been reported to scale up nanofiber production.…”
Section: E V E N T H O U G H T H E I N D U S T R I a L A P P L I C A mentioning
confidence: 99%