2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fidgety movements – tiny in appearance, but huge in impact

Abstract: Abnormal, absent, or sporadic FMs indicate an increased risk for later neurological dysfunction, whereas normal FMs are highly predictive of normal development, especially if they co-occur with other smooth and fluent movements. Early recognition of neurological signs facilitates early intervention. It is important to re-assure parents of infants with clinical risk factors that the neurological outcome will be adequate if FMs develop normally.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
107
1
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
107
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical flow in the non-fidgety movement sequence changes rather smoothly over the whole image, whereas in the fidgety movement sequence the optical flow changes its orientation rapidly within different areas of the image. This coincides with the description of fidgety movements as unpredictable and spontaneous movements in all directions [37, 109]. …”
Section: Multidimensional Assessment Of Cpg-related Neurofunctions: Psupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical flow in the non-fidgety movement sequence changes rather smoothly over the whole image, whereas in the fidgety movement sequence the optical flow changes its orientation rapidly within different areas of the image. This coincides with the description of fidgety movements as unpredictable and spontaneous movements in all directions [37, 109]. …”
Section: Multidimensional Assessment Of Cpg-related Neurofunctions: Psupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Compared to the non-fidgety movement sequence, the fidgety movement sequence shows (i) higher short-term variance in r, (ii) larger number of small-to-medium-sized pulses in r and (iii) higher short-term variance in theta and phi, causing many spontaneous changes in the movement direction. Also these characteristics reliably match with Gestalt-based fidgety movements descriptions [37, 109]. …”
Section: Multidimensional Assessment Of Cpg-related Neurofunctions: Pmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is an exceptionally high rate of occurrence, as abnormal fidgety movements are usually rare (see also Table 2). It has been a matter of debate whether or not infants with a low muscle tone are more likely to show abnormal fidgety movements (Einspieler, Peharz, & Marschik, 2016; Yuge et al, 2011). Although this may not be consentaneously defined, a low muscle tone is a general feature in infants with Down syndrome (Latash, 2007; Morris, Vaughan, & Vaccaro, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this may not be consentaneously defined, a low muscle tone is a general feature in infants with Down syndrome (Latash, 2007; Morris, Vaughan, & Vaccaro, 1982). A number of studies have documented an association between abnormal fidgety movements and coordination difficulties and/or disabilities in fine manipulative skills at school age (Einspieler et al, 2007, Einspieler et al, 2016); others describe an exceedingly high rate of abnormal fidgety movements in infants who were later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders or Rett syndrome (Einspieler et al, 2005, Einspieler et al, 2014). However, most so-called abnormal fidgety movements in infants later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders or Rett syndrome did not correspond with the category of abnormal fidgety movements described in infants with brain injuries, which were exaggerated in amplitude and speed (Einspieler & Prechtl, 2005; Einspieler et al, 2016, Prechtl et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fidgety movements are small movements of the neck, trunk and limbs in all directions and of variable acceleration; they last until the end of the 5 th month when intentional movements become predominant [14, 22]. If fidgety movements are present and normal in their quality, infants will very likely develop normally [13, 23]. None of the 16 infants with a later diagnosis of RTT (reported in the literature) ever showed normal fidgety movements; their fidgety movements were either absent or abnormal, i. e. jerky and too slow, or jerky and abrupt [7, 18, 21].…”
Section: The Motor Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%