Fidler’s Life Style Performance Model: Why We Disagree With Hocking and Whiteford’s Critique

Abstract

R ecently, Hocking and Whiteford (1997) critically reviewed Fidler's Life Sryle Performance Model, challenging the clariry of theoretical construction of the model, the claims of the universali ry of application of the model, and the scholarship of Fidlet's (19%) writing. We do not concur. We find Hocking and White ford's premises to be unsupported, their arguments ullclear, and their examples taken out of comext. What Is a Model?In rhis article, we use the term moriel to articulate a "grand theory" (Morse & Field, 1995, p. 6) A grand theory describes how the body of knowledge or conceptual toundations of occ upational therapy are linked togerher. Midrallge theories or concepts are more specitlc III nature, relating speciEc constructs associated with rhe phenomenon. In addition, we assume thar occupational therapy uses, tests, and applies theory From related disciplines ,md develops, tests, and applies theories uniquely related ro occupatIon.The use of a model to guide practice allows an occupational therapist to maintain his or her holistic perspecrive regarding rhe ellvironment, occupational performance, and occupation. The model helps to explain the reality in which human beings exist. Theoretical ConstructionHocking and Whiteford (1997) suggested that the Lite Sryle Pedormance Model is a new model of practice 6)[ occupational therapy. As such 'its author(s) should attempt to extend the existing knowledge base" (fJ. 15')).