1997
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199715000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field evaluation of alternative testing strategies for diagnosis and differentiation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections in an HIV-1 and HIV-2-prevalent area

Abstract: High sensitivities and specificities were obtained with various combinations of assays including RST as well as ELISA, and these procedures are well suited for field use in Africa. Serodiagnostic strategies for HIV can be based on RST alone and differentiation between HIV-1 and HIV-2 can be achieved as part of these strategies. Large differences in the capacity of individual assays to discriminate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 were observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our survey, carried out as part of the ANRS 1201/1202 Ditrame Plus program for PMTCT (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire), demonstrated the ability of a serial algorithm to function accurately under actual West African field conditions in the context of the circulation of the predominant subtype, HIV-1 CRF02. Our data confirm and extend the findings of others (1,2,17,18,29). Despite difficult working conditions in the peripheral laboratories (no air conditioning, frequent power failures, and little equipment), our strategy achieved maximum initial sensitivity with the first-line rapid assay (in our experience, no HIV infection in an HIV-infected woman was missed by using the Determine test) and a high specificity with the second one (the Genie II assay).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our survey, carried out as part of the ANRS 1201/1202 Ditrame Plus program for PMTCT (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire), demonstrated the ability of a serial algorithm to function accurately under actual West African field conditions in the context of the circulation of the predominant subtype, HIV-1 CRF02. Our data confirm and extend the findings of others (1,2,17,18,29). Despite difficult working conditions in the peripheral laboratories (no air conditioning, frequent power failures, and little equipment), our strategy achieved maximum initial sensitivity with the first-line rapid assay (in our experience, no HIV infection in an HIV-infected woman was missed by using the Determine test) and a high specificity with the second one (the Genie II assay).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the field performance of these alternative rapid assays is still poorly documented (20,24,25,29,31). Most of the published evaluations, including those performed in Africa (1,2,13,18,30), were done retrospectively in reference laboratories with stored plasma and/or with limited numbers of samples taken prospectively. Additionally, it must be pointed out that these evaluations must take into account two supplementary challenges in Africa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing strategies for HIV must include an algorithm for the second-round testing of all reactive or inconclusive samples from the initial screening assay to determine whether the initial reactivities were true or false (1,24,31). Samples interpreted as inconclusive or reactive should be retested in a second assay that uses a different technology and antigens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening-reactive samples were confirmed by Pepti-LAV 1-2 (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) as previously described (20). The group of healthy controls was tested for HIV antibodies in accordance with a similar alternative testing strategy described elsewhere (3).…”
Section: Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%