2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field evaluation of two diffusive samplers and two adsorbent media to determine 1,3-butadiene and benzene levels in air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of humidity during sampling has also been discussed for specific compounds in different adsorbents. Studies using Carbopack X or Carbograph 5 reported no indication of lower uptakes of 1,3-butadiene and benzene with high relative humidity (60-80%) as compared to samples from a low (about 20%) humidity environment [203]. Studies using Tenax GR in combination with Carbosieve SIII as adsorbents for a number of aromatic and halogenated compounds showed comparable recoveries between tubes humidified with 49% RH and 88% RH, and the ones obtained for dry tubes [204].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The influence of humidity during sampling has also been discussed for specific compounds in different adsorbents. Studies using Carbopack X or Carbograph 5 reported no indication of lower uptakes of 1,3-butadiene and benzene with high relative humidity (60-80%) as compared to samples from a low (about 20%) humidity environment [203]. Studies using Tenax GR in combination with Carbosieve SIII as adsorbents for a number of aromatic and halogenated compounds showed comparable recoveries between tubes humidified with 49% RH and 88% RH, and the ones obtained for dry tubes [204].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The mean relative standard deviation (%MRSD) obtained for different sampling periods was in every case<6.5%. Numerous studies have thoroughly validated the use of Radiello® samplers for VOC monitoring (Pennequin-Cardinal et al 2005;Strandberg et al 2006;Plaisance et al 2008;Buzica et al 2008;Cocheo et al 2009), concluding that this method shows good agreement with the results obtained by active sampling and that it is valid for obtaining indicative measurements as regards Directive 2008/50/EC. For these reasons, we chose to set up only one sampler at each monitored level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Temperature and relative humidity could have potential impacts on the performance of the passive samplers (Strandberg et al, 2006). In the exposure chamber experiments, five batches were conducted for different temperature and four batches for different relative humidity.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature and Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%