1980
DOI: 10.1016/0166-0934(80)90022-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-flow fractionation of alkali-liberated nuclear polyhedrosis virus from gypsy moth Lymantria dispar linnaeus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One obvious application is the analysis of viruses and virus-like particles (VLPs) used as vaccines and prospective gene delivery agents, where the unique particle fractionation characteristics of FFF provide advantage. However, despite numerous studies into the use of FFF for bacteriophage and virus analysis over a period of 30 years (Caldwell et al, 1980(Caldwell et al, , 1981Giddings et al, 1977;Litzen and Wahlund, 1989;Thielking and Kulicke, 1998;Yonker et al, 1985), the technique has so-far failed to gain widespread acceptance among commercial, academic, and regulatory groups. This lack of acceptance is because of: (i) until recently, a lack of commercial precision instrumentation; (ii) no reliable published method for virus and VLP analysis; (iii) a general lack of sufficient ''uncommitted'' samples with which to develop such a method; and (iv) concerns that the technique inherently changes the sample aggregation state because of the so-called ''adsorption effect'' (Giddings et al, 1977), wherein the sample is concentrated near a membrane during analysis, increasing the potential for membrane-sample and sample-sample induced aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One obvious application is the analysis of viruses and virus-like particles (VLPs) used as vaccines and prospective gene delivery agents, where the unique particle fractionation characteristics of FFF provide advantage. However, despite numerous studies into the use of FFF for bacteriophage and virus analysis over a period of 30 years (Caldwell et al, 1980(Caldwell et al, , 1981Giddings et al, 1977;Litzen and Wahlund, 1989;Thielking and Kulicke, 1998;Yonker et al, 1985), the technique has so-far failed to gain widespread acceptance among commercial, academic, and regulatory groups. This lack of acceptance is because of: (i) until recently, a lack of commercial precision instrumentation; (ii) no reliable published method for virus and VLP analysis; (iii) a general lack of sufficient ''uncommitted'' samples with which to develop such a method; and (iv) concerns that the technique inherently changes the sample aggregation state because of the so-called ''adsorption effect'' (Giddings et al, 1977), wherein the sample is concentrated near a membrane during analysis, increasing the potential for membrane-sample and sample-sample induced aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) was alkali-liberated from the gypsy moth Lyrnantria dispar L., and the assortment of enveloped aggregated and monomeric forms were separated by sedimentation FFF (Caldwell et al, 1980). Effective molecular weights could be assigned to the various resolved particles, and with the aid of electron microscopy they were characterized as monomers, dimers, etc.…”
Section: Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-line coupled HPLC/GC has been reported in the literature for a variety of applications (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) but not, so far as we are aware, for the determination of PAC in exhaust particulate extracts. From these reports, it seems that on-line HPLC/GC has better sensitivity, reproducibility, and ease of operation than equivalent off-line systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%