2001
DOI: 10.1049/el:20010248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field trial of optical performance monitor in dynamically configurable DWDM network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured BERs are extrapolated to the crossover point of both branches (compare e.g. [16]). Within systems using forward error correction (FEC), high bit error rates before FEC correction can occur.…”
Section: Receiver Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured BERs are extrapolated to the crossover point of both branches (compare e.g. [16]). Within systems using forward error correction (FEC), high bit error rates before FEC correction can occur.…”
Section: Receiver Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many OPM methods [10][11][12][13]. However, the techniques are usually based on direct measurement of optical parameters such as OSNR [14][15][16], pilot tones [17], Q-factor measurement [18,19], in/out-of-service BER measurement/estimation [20][21][22], subcarrier multiplexing [23], data correlation [24], non-linear detection [25]. They all require some degree of signal tapping [26], resulting in an intrusive approach, which will be introducing at least minor performance degradation due to either increased attenuation or monitoring signal injection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the proposed algorithm, we conduct computer simulations in both Gaussian and non-Gaussian distribution cases. earlier to estimate BER [15][16][17]. However, to our knowledge, the earlier researchers have not analyzed this scheme clearly and have not presented a related algorithm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%