2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
218
4
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
15
218
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, numerous factors influence total number of citations. Our study could not evaluate citations in textbooks, lectures, and other web-based literature [10,19,25]. Similarly, authors may be likely to cite articles from the journal in which they hope to publish their study [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Third, numerous factors influence total number of citations. Our study could not evaluate citations in textbooks, lectures, and other web-based literature [10,19,25]. Similarly, authors may be likely to cite articles from the journal in which they hope to publish their study [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All the articles were written in English, probably because English is the most frequently used language in the orthopaedic literature, including orthopaedic subspecialties [1,3,6,13,16,17,19,24,25]. Moreover, the predominance of English-language articles may be one reason that fewer Chinese-authored orthopaedic articles appear in international journals compared with western countries, because writing in a foreign language may be a hindrance for Chinese researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, because the magnitude of the differences between the groups is so large (ie, mean 86 versus 33 citations), exclusion of self-citation would be unlikely, we believe, to change the major findings. Again, recent prior bibliometric studies in orthopaedics either acknowledge this as a limitation of the search strategy used but do not account for this bias or do not state whether self-citations were excluded [1,2,6,8,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%