2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final Evaluation of a Clinical Phase III Trial Comparing Treosulfan to Busulfan-Based Conditioning Therapy Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation of Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Ineligible to Standard Myeloablative Regimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of a randomized trial comparing treosulfan-fludarabine vs busulfan-fludarabine in adult AML and MDS patients ineligible for standard MAC regimens (NCT00822393), reported in abstract form, have demonstrated a significant improvement in OS after treosulfanbased conditioning. 32 This benefit was primarily attributed to the reduction in TRM while preserving antileukemic efficacy.…”
Section: Allogeneic Hsctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of a randomized trial comparing treosulfan-fludarabine vs busulfan-fludarabine in adult AML and MDS patients ineligible for standard MAC regimens (NCT00822393), reported in abstract form, have demonstrated a significant improvement in OS after treosulfanbased conditioning. 32 This benefit was primarily attributed to the reduction in TRM while preserving antileukemic efficacy.…”
Section: Allogeneic Hsctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Towards improving conditioning regimens, there was a large multi-center Phase III study from Europe that compared the use of treosulfan in place of busulfan in the setting of a RIC conditioning regimen for older patients and those not eligible to receive a full myelo-ablative conditioning regimen which clearly established the statistically significant advantage of the treosulfan based regimen on event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) [4]. Another relatively novel approach was the use of time sequential conditioning regimens with targeted dose busulfan and post-transplant cyclophoshamide graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, building on the earlier experience by this group with this regimen [5].…”
Section: Aml and Mdsmentioning
confidence: 99%