Finding Archaeology in 2017: What Is Archaeology and Why Are We Doing It?  Why Should We Be Doing It?

Abstract

These annual review essays focus on what we as archaeologists are doing year by year. Many themes continue on from review to review, waxing and waning, not unlike the bell curves of a traditional pottery seriation.Each year, themes are highlighted and presented in varied ways according to the orientation and aims of the reviewer. All do a masterful job of curating the vast range of what archaeologists were, in each annual period, currently producing. My review follows in the footsteps of its predecessors, summarizing an array of new and exciting research, and describing how agendas presented in 2017 cluster around sets of related questions and aims. It will also look at the growing literature that asks, in one way or another, fundamental questions about what archaeology really is and why we pursue it. In this time when the value of academic pursuits and scientific perspectives are being highly scrutinized in politics and popular culture, archaeologists are faced with the uncomfortable question of "What is it, really, that we should be doing?" [archaeology, current issues, public archaeology, digital archaeology] RESUMEN Estos ensayos de revisión anual se enfocan en lo que como arqueólogos estamos haciendo año tras año. Muchos temas continúan de revisión en revisión, creciendo o menguando, no muy diferente de las curvas en forma de campana de la seriación de la cerámica tradicional. Cada año, temas son enfatizados y presentados de varias maneras de acuerdo a la orientación y metas del crítico. Todos hacen un trabajo magistral de organizar un rango vasto de lo que los arqueólogos estaban, en cada período anual, realmente produciendo. Mi revisión sigue los pasos de sus predecesores, resumiendo una colección de nueva y emocionante investigación, y describiendo cómo las agendas presentadas en el 2017 se agrupan alrededor de juegos de cuestiones y metas relacionadas.También examina la creciente literatura que pregunta, de una manera u otra, cuestiones fundamentales acerca de lo que la arqueología realmente es y por qué nos dedicamos a ella. En este tiempo cuando el valor de los empeños académicos y las perspectivas científicas están siendo altamente escrutados en política y cultura popular, los arqueólogos se enfrentan a la pregunta incomoda de "¿Qué es lo que realmente deberíamos estar haciendo?"[arqueología, cuestiones actuales, arqueología pública, arqueología digital] ARCHAEOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION?While the theme of what such a diverse discipline should be subtly undergirds much of the literature, a number of 2017 articles, each in a very different way, directly address the very nature of what archaeology is and why we practice it. In the Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, Assaf Nativ (2017, 55) asks us to reconsider our notions of the

Uppdragsarkeologiska möjligheter

“…Det finns omfattande forskningsresultat att tillgå för att utveckla uppdragsarkeo logins arbete med angelägna samhällsfrågor ( Harrison & Breithoff 2017, Lewis 2018, Mizoguchi & Smith 2019. Några av många exempel på temaområden som undersökts är: mångfaldsfrågor ( Ashworth et al 2007, Högberg 2013a, social utsatthet ( Kiddey 2017, Schaepe et al 2017, migration ( Aldenderfer et al 2019, De Léon 2012, framtidsfrågor ( Holtorf 2018, Holtorf & Högberg 2015, 2021, Högberg et al 2017, hälsa och välmående ( Engström 2017, Everill et al 2020, Perry 2019, Zipsane 2011, välfärd och tillväxt ( Burtenshaw 2017, Gould & Pyburn 2017, politisk kulturarvsekonomi ( Niklasson 2016 ), utbildningsvetenskap och skolundervisning ( Bender & Shackel 2019, Dutra Leivas 2020, Högberg 2006, 2007, 2008a, 2008b, Samida 2010, social hållbarhet ( Högberg 2013a.…”

Differentiating human from non‐human bone fragments through histomorphological assessment of remains from Camposanto cemetery, Italy

“…Archaeological studies aim to understand how life existed in the past and develop insight into patterns and changes in human behaviour. This ensures a more holistic understanding of how the past influenced present society and the way people interact (Lewis, 2018). It is important to identify the wild and domesticated animals consumed by a community as this informs an understanding of past behaviours and lifestyles of the residents.…”

Reorienting Bioarchaeology for an Era of Reconciliation

“…Akin to archaeology, bioarchaeology can be adapted into a serviceable avenue to address the marginalization and suppression of Indigenous culture (Lewis 2018). This consultant approach would guide what questions were to be asked within the aims of the project and the partnership with the community, optimizing the meaningfulness of its impact (Köpe 1997).…”