1986
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/29.5.390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Response Times in a Real-Time System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
479
0
27

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 896 publications
(507 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
479
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof is identical to the one given in [10] which states that the worst Case Response Time of any task should be less than or equal to its deadline. An example of GEDF or UEDF algorithm Assuming that there are three tasks which reach at time 0, namely the task τ 1 , τ 2 , τ 3 .…”
Section: Cs Jmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The proof is identical to the one given in [10] which states that the worst Case Response Time of any task should be less than or equal to its deadline. An example of GEDF or UEDF algorithm Assuming that there are three tasks which reach at time 0, namely the task τ 1 , τ 2 , τ 3 .…”
Section: Cs Jmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The traditional response time calculation (Audsley et al 1993;Joseph and Pandya 1986) for fixed-priority pre-emptive scheduling on a uniprocessor is based on an upper bound on the WCET of each task τ i , denoted by C i . By contrast, our MRTA framework dissects the individual components (processor and memory demands) that contribute to the WCET bound and re-assembles them at the level of the worst-case response time.…”
Section: Response Time Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it is necessary to evaluate if a certain partitioning leads to a valid solution. We know from [20], that the worst-case response time r i,j,k of an independent thread θ i,j,k scheduled with a preemptive fixed-priority scheduling algorithm, is given by (6):…”
Section: Fully-partitioned Distributed Multi-core Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%