2022
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9100590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Validation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Implications for the Injury Mechanism

Abstract: This study aimed to establish a finite element model that vividly reflected the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) geometry and investigated the ACL stress distribution under different loading conditions. The ACL’s three-dimensional finite element model was based on a human cadaveric knee. Simulations of three loading conditions (134 N anterior tibial load, 5 Nm external tibial torque, 5 Nm internal tibial torque) on the knee model were performed. Experiments were performed on a knee specimen using a robotic uni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using mathematical models that considered the ligament as a single sheet evaluated the stresses on the ligament macroscopically by inputting the mechanical properties measured on the actual excised ligament into the model [ 18 ]. In these cases, the mechanical properties of the ligament could be the average of those of collagen, elastin, and other components of the ligament.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies using mathematical models that considered the ligament as a single sheet evaluated the stresses on the ligament macroscopically by inputting the mechanical properties measured on the actual excised ligament into the model [ 18 ]. In these cases, the mechanical properties of the ligament could be the average of those of collagen, elastin, and other components of the ligament.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer simulations can also be used to predict parameters for which the exact values are not known by comparing them with actual measurements. One pertaining problem is that many simulation studies consider the ligament to be a uniform collagen fibre bundle [ 15 17 ] or sheet [ 18 , 19 ], ignoring the mechanical properties of its other major components, elastin, and the interaction between collagen and elastin. Although the content and distribution of elastin have been studied at the molecular level and their unique mechanical properties have been tackled, their anatomical or physiological role in ligaments has not been fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies using mathematical models that considered the ligament as a single sheet have evaluated the stresses on the ligament macroscopically by inputting mechanical properties measured on the actual excised ligament into the model [13]. In these cases, the mechanical properties of the ligament could be an average of collagen, elastin, and other components of the ligament.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, elastin accounts for approximately 10% of the dry weight of the ECM and be thought to give the ligaments extensibility [11,12]. Most studies on the mechanical response of ligaments consider the ligament as a single uniform sheet [13,14] or focus only on collagen bers [15,16], ignoring the mechanical properties of the other major component, elastin, and the interaction between collagen and elastin. In addition, although the mechanical response of collagen bers at the micro level has been studied [17], the mechanical response between collagen and elastin at the submicron level has been little studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80 Local variables such as stress-strain can be obtained by implanting pressure sensors in ligaments. 81 Knee prosthesis with sensors also provide data such as joint surface stress. 82 EMG signals enable the activation of muscles and serve as an objective evaluation indicator for muscle models.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%