2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2014.7430998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First acquisition of data from a prototype 3-D position sensitive CZT PET system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are developing a small animal positron emission tomography (PET) system based on cross-strip CZT detectors configured to achieve high spatial resolution and high sensitivity (Figure 2) [11, 12, 13, 14, 3, 15, 16, 17]. This system comprises four panels providing an adjustable, box-shaped field of view with maximum field-of-view (FOV) of 100 mm × 100 mm × 80 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are developing a small animal positron emission tomography (PET) system based on cross-strip CZT detectors configured to achieve high spatial resolution and high sensitivity (Figure 2) [11, 12, 13, 14, 3, 15, 16, 17]. This system comprises four panels providing an adjustable, box-shaped field of view with maximum field-of-view (FOV) of 100 mm × 100 mm × 80 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High density channels increases the cost of the readout electronics especially when it comes to integration of large-scale electronics for applications such as PET and SPECT. In cross-strip detector configuration, anodes and cathodes are perpendicular to each other which offers a high packing fraction (99%) by enabling tight stack of crystals on top of each other and lower number of readout channels [5]- [8]. In some applications, the reduced complexity of the readout electronics, low cost, and high packing fraction make cross-strip configurations advantageous at the cost of higher capacitance and lower energy resolution compared to the pixel-array design [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%