1965
DOI: 10.1007/bf02860949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First clonal generation potato seedling selection at two locations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 97 selections made at one location, and the 98 selections made at the second location, only 21 were selected by both locations. Davies and Johnston (1965) reported that growing duplicate first clonal generation materials at two Canadian locations, one in Ontario, the other in New Brunswick, while resulting in a high degree of duplication since 72-82 % of the clones were discarded by both selectors, nevertheless, resulted in the identification of many selections suitable for the Ontario location that the breeding location in New Brunswick discarded. Harris et al (1967) evaluated 210 first field generation clones at three Canadian locations and concluded that selecting initially at the breeding location did not appear to result in the loss of clones potentially useful for the two prairie locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 97 selections made at one location, and the 98 selections made at the second location, only 21 were selected by both locations. Davies and Johnston (1965) reported that growing duplicate first clonal generation materials at two Canadian locations, one in Ontario, the other in New Brunswick, while resulting in a high degree of duplication since 72-82 % of the clones were discarded by both selectors, nevertheless, resulted in the identification of many selections suitable for the Ontario location that the breeding location in New Brunswick discarded. Harris et al (1967) evaluated 210 first field generation clones at three Canadian locations and concluded that selecting initially at the breeding location did not appear to result in the loss of clones potentially useful for the two prairie locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two separate studies looking at the agreement between first clonal generation materials selected in two locations, both Blomquist and Lauer (1962) and Davies and Johnston (1965) found that a small percentage of clones were selected at both locations. Only 2.3 % of the clones were selected at two locations in Minnesota (Blomquist and Lauer 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neele et al (1988) reported that the use of two-plant plots instead of one-plant ones in C1 helped reduce the environmental variance, but it had only slightly positive effect on the selection efficiency. In two separate studies, looking at the agreement between C1 materials selected in two locations, both Blomquist and Lauer (1962) and Davies and Johnston (1965) found that a small percentage of clones were selected at both locations. Only 2.3% of the clones were selected at two locations in Minnesota (Blomquist and Lauer 1962).…”
Section: Selection Of Superior Clones In the Segregating Progenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If evaluation is carried out on the phenotypic performance of a single, unreplicated, plant plot, micro-environmental variation may hamper effective selection (DAVIES & JOHNSTON, 1965, 1968. The size of tubers used to plant the first clonal year can have a large effect on yield produced .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%