2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12303-022-0032-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First hand observations from the April 28, 2021 Sonitpur (MW 6.4) earthquake, Assam, India: possible mechanism involved in the occurrence of widespread ground effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The substantial damage in these regions further indicated the impact of the local soil characteristics. Thus, the localized ground effects observed align with findings reported by [38][39][40] in other earthquake studies (Pohang Earthquake, Sonitpur Earthquake). Sharma et al [23] have also discussed the similar effects of surface geology and topography on the damage severity during the 2015 Gorkha Nepal Earthquake.…”
Section: Seismically Induced Geotechnical Impactssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The substantial damage in these regions further indicated the impact of the local soil characteristics. Thus, the localized ground effects observed align with findings reported by [38][39][40] in other earthquake studies (Pohang Earthquake, Sonitpur Earthquake). Sharma et al [23] have also discussed the similar effects of surface geology and topography on the damage severity during the 2015 Gorkha Nepal Earthquake.…”
Section: Seismically Induced Geotechnical Impactssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There is a possibility that the Brahmaputra River water maintained the flow toward the aquifer at OW1 for a shorter period (in our case 2-week anomaly period), which is in line with the transient water fluctuations observed in the epicentral area of the mainshock (E1) by Joshi et al (2023) and Bhadran et al (2022). Joshi et al (2023) documented a temporary reactivation of dry streams with a rapid rise in water levels, while rivers and ponds experienced a transient increase (∼0.5 m) in water levels.…”
Section: Hydrochemical Anomaliessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…There is a possibility that the Brahmaputra River water maintained the flow toward the aquifer at OW1 for a shorter period (in our case 2-week anomaly period), which is in line with the transient water fluctuations observed in the epicentral area of the mainshock (E1) by Joshi et al (2023) and Bhadran et al (2022). Joshi et al (2023) documented a temporary reactivation of dry streams with a rapid rise in water levels, while rivers and ponds experienced a transient increase (∼0.5 m) in water levels. Bhadran et al (2022) reported that groundwater levels in dug wells abruptly rose by 4-6 m. They also observed a significant decline in water levels in the Gabharu River (a northern bank tributary of the Brahmaputra River at a distance of ∼106 km from OW1) by the fourth day, with complete drying before the fourteenth day following the mainshock.…”
Section: Hydrochemical Anomaliessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…locking depth and slip rate of the fault when the accumulation time and fault length ar fixed. Therefore, the slip rate and locking depth are two important parameters for as sessing the seismic hazard and tectonic activity of an active fault [34]. Velocity profiles ca provide direct observations to determine the slip rate and locking depth.…”
Section: Inversion Of Slip Rate and Locking Depth Along The Weihe Faultmentioning
confidence: 99%