“…For comparison, the predicted thickness of Finsen's ejecta and their local excavation was <8 m at the landing site (Huang et al, 2018;Lai et al, 2020), which is contradicted with the top ∼10-13 m thick materials being entirely developed in Finsen's ejecta (Lai et al, 2019). One hydrocode simulation argued that Finsen's ejecta were >30 m thick at the landing site (Di et al, 2019), which was not supported by observations based on reflectance spectra (Li et al, 2020;Qiao et al, 2019) or predictions based on ballistic sedimentation models (Huang et al, 2018;Lai et al, 2020). On the other hand, discontinuous layering of weak and strong echoes are observed in the LPR radargrams ( Figure 1e), with the consensus being emplaced as distal ejecta (Lai et al, 2020(Lai et al, , 2019Li et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020).…”