2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68821-9_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Step Towards Creating a Software Package for Detecting the Dangerous States During Driver Eye Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First phase: identifying individual tubers in the image. Because the system must process 4-5 images with a resolution of 3840 × 2160 pixels per second, the Viola-Jones method [58][59][60][61][62][63] is the most suitable method for detecting tubers. But even taking into account the high performance of this algorithm, the processing of such an image format will take an unacceptably long time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First phase: identifying individual tubers in the image. Because the system must process 4-5 images with a resolution of 3840 × 2160 pixels per second, the Viola-Jones method [58][59][60][61][62][63] is the most suitable method for detecting tubers. But even taking into account the high performance of this algorithm, the processing of such an image format will take an unacceptably long time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proposed using the Viola-Jones algorithm at the first stage of processing the image from a video camera, which, unlike convolutional neural networks, works in a real-time mode [58][59][60][61][62][63]. This method was created for recognizing human faces and did not give good results when used to detect potato tubers; however, by selecting preprocessing filters, we achieved a probability of 97%, which corresponds to the results of a convolutional neural network (from 91 to 95% in works on convolutional networks for the last three years) [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%