1980
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90142-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-trimester fetal chromosomal diagnosis using endocervical lavage: A negative evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in the "Introduction", Rhine at al. (1977) were able to detect fetal cells in a proportion of cultured TCC samples, but these results were not confirmed by Goldberg et al (1980), despite their having seen trophoblastic cellular elements in the original samples. The reason for this discrepancy is probably the length of culture time; the longer the cells are kept in culture, the more likely would be the presence of maternal cells.…”
Section: In-vitro Culture Of Tcc Samplesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned in the "Introduction", Rhine at al. (1977) were able to detect fetal cells in a proportion of cultured TCC samples, but these results were not confirmed by Goldberg et al (1980), despite their having seen trophoblastic cellular elements in the original samples. The reason for this discrepancy is probably the length of culture time; the longer the cells are kept in culture, the more likely would be the presence of maternal cells.…”
Section: In-vitro Culture Of Tcc Samplesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, using the same procedure, Goldberg et al (1980) detected only cells in metaphase with maternal chromosome banding patterns, although they had observed trophoblastic cellular elements in the original samples.…”
Section: Collection Of Tcc Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several more studies were published up to 1980 with conflicting results (Bobrow and Lewis, 1971;Warren et al, 1971;Tsuji and Sasaki, 1973;Goldstein et al, 1973;Manuel et al, 1974;Rhine et al, 1975Rhine et al, , 1977Rhine and Milunsky, 1979;Amankwah and Bond, 1977;Varner et al, 1977;Goldberg et al, 1980), reviewed by Adinolfi (1995). More recently, the emergence of new technology, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be simple to perform and cost effective, with minimal inter-observer variability. A number of techniques have been devised to retrieve TCC samples from the endocervical canal and the endometrial cavity, including smears obtained with cotton swabs or a cytobrush (1416), aspiration of cervical mucus with a catheter (17–19), endometrial biopsy with a Pipelle (20), and lavage of the endocervical canal (2124) or the uterine cavity (14;22;25), all with variable success (Table 1). …”
Section: Retrieval Of Trophoblast Cells From the Cervixmentioning
confidence: 99%