2012
DOI: 10.1002/uog.10051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First‐trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities by integrated application of nuchal translucency, nasal bone, tricuspid regurgitation and ductus venosus flow combined with maternal serum free β‐hCG and PAPP‐A: a 5‐year prospective study

Abstract: Objective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
30
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion of more parameters also greatly decreased the FPR. Compared to the group incorporating biochemical markers and NT with an FPR of 4.1%, the group that extended all markers had a lower FPR of 2.4%, which is consistent with the study by Ghaffari et al [23]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Inclusion of more parameters also greatly decreased the FPR. Compared to the group incorporating biochemical markers and NT with an FPR of 4.1%, the group that extended all markers had a lower FPR of 2.4%, which is consistent with the study by Ghaffari et al [23]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Regarding the expanded combined test, an improved screening efficacy has been reported in previous studies, obtaining both an increased DR and a reduced FPR (10-29%) [15,25]. In our series, only the addition of DV or NB ± DV to the combined test resulted in a reduction of FPR by about one fourth (25-29%), similar to that reported in a previous study [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, we failed to reach the excellent 100% detection rates obtained by Hsiao et al [14] or Ghaffari et al [15] at lower FPRs of 2.4% or 3.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…Using an ultrasound only based protocol, with NT and all additional markers, for a FPR of 5%, the detection rate for T21 reached 94-97.5% [11][12][13]. When all of these markers were added to a traditional combined test, the detection rate substantially increased to up to 100%, for a FPR of 2.4% [14] or 3.4% [15].…”
Section: Www Journalsviamedicapl/ginekologia_polskamentioning
confidence: 89%