2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish otolith asymmetry: Morphometry and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
66
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
12
66
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An agreement with the value of weight asymmetry observed in marine fishes (Lychakov et al, 2006) and did not depend on otolith growth rate. Moreover, the absolute value of the otolith non-asymmetry with the fish length and this is a characteristic of the littoral fishes (Lychakov, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An agreement with the value of weight asymmetry observed in marine fishes (Lychakov et al, 2006) and did not depend on otolith growth rate. Moreover, the absolute value of the otolith non-asymmetry with the fish length and this is a characteristic of the littoral fishes (Lychakov, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the analysis where a large number of specimens is used with clear differences in the fish size, such discrepancies in the otolith weight between the two sides of fish head become minimal (Lychakov et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inconsistency and incongruity of the otolith from both sides of the head can be due the otolith weight asymmetry that could lead to acoustic imperfections in fishes (Lychakov and Rebane, 2005;Lychakov, 2006). Therefore, the damage in the tasks of the vestibular and auditory sense are unavoidable, but Lychakov et al (2006) suggested that the certain measureable morphological and physiological outcomes of otolith asymmetry are uncertain at this stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%