2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03458.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish trophic structure in estuaries, with particular emphasis on estuarine typology and zoogeography

Abstract: A comparative analysis of the fish trophic structure was undertaken on some 190 South African estuaries spanning three zoogeographic regions and incorporating three broad estuarine types. Fish biomass trophic guild compositions and biomass trophic spectrum profiles were analysed using multivariate statistical techniques and included both inter-regional (zoogeographic) and intra-regional (estuarine typology) comparisons. Differences in the fish trophic structure of the various estuary types within each zoogeogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, individuals of all functional groups occurred in all salinity sectors and, thus, this metric was not useful for differentiating assemblages along the salinity gradient using a mean model. Our results differed from those of other studies, which emphasized the importance of functional groups in determining fish assemblages along salinity gradients (ELLIOTT; DEWAILLY, 1995;MATHIESON et al, 2000;BOUCHEREAU, 2004;WHITFIELD, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, individuals of all functional groups occurred in all salinity sectors and, thus, this metric was not useful for differentiating assemblages along the salinity gradient using a mean model. Our results differed from those of other studies, which emphasized the importance of functional groups in determining fish assemblages along salinity gradients (ELLIOTT; DEWAILLY, 1995;MATHIESON et al, 2000;BOUCHEREAU, 2004;WHITFIELD, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Similarly, in estuarine fish assemblages in South Africa most species belonged to trophic levels lower than 3.5 (Harrison and Whitfield 2012). The differences observed may be attributed to the characteristic environments sampled in these estuarine areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Other possible ecological explanations for the different nutritional conditions of fish larvae in the two estuaries under study might be different predation pressures (Harrison and Whitfield 2012) and the influence of the average maternal age (Berkeley et al 2004). With regard to predation pressure, and given the different hydrological characteristics of these two estuaries, the cues that attract marine fish into the estuaries will be different, and hence the numbers and types of predators entering the estuaries may also be different (Harrison and Whitfield 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which fish are affected by these alterations is still to be fully understood, despite studies on the ecological role of fish assemblages in South African estuaries (see Harrison and Whitfield 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%