Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review

Khan, Khalid S.; Kunz, Regina; Kleijnen, Jos; Antes, Gerd

doi:10.1177/014107680309600304

Cited by 1,049 publications

(691 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

635

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…With this in mind, this review proposes a methodological research design based on a basic process of three stages: (1) inputs definition, (2) processing data, and (3) outputs presentation [45]. Likewise, each stage consists of interconnected phases that support the process of the systematic review of the literature undertaken here [46][47][48]. Figure 1 schematically summarizes the research methodology followed in this review, illustrating the stages and phases, the tools and methods used in its development, as well as the corresponding sections in the article.…”

Section: Research Methods and Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays the advance towards sustainability poses a global challenge for modern society as well as for companies. Professionals and academics continually redefine business processes and design management mechanisms in a more appropriate way in order to allow companies to balance economic activity with the environmental and social impact that they generate. Under this complex and dynamic scenario, creating a product, providing a service, or achieving a given result requires a different interpretation of the efficiency paradigm and an adequate socio-environmental intelligence. In the context of project management, sustainability-related knowledge, skills, and suitable tools are necessary to face this challenge. Moreover, its close relationship with stakeholder theory presents an alternative to approach that purpose. This article attempts a systematic review of the literature on stakeholder theory in project management during the past nine years, with the aim of providing a comprehensive view of this relationship, revealing its impact and influence on sustainability, and finding new research paths. We highlight the potential benefits derived from this relationship, either as an instrument for the promotion of corporate social responsibility and inclusive policies, as a means for the generation of shared value and technological innovation, or as a key factor in the strategy and business management of a given project.

show abstract

Section: Research Methods and Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The term “quality” refers to: “the degree to which a study employs measures to minimize bias and errors in its design, conduct, and analysis” (Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, & Antes, 2003).

CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)—for evaluation of the quality of evidence in randomized control and control trials.

…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation to poststroke visual field loss: A systematic review

Howard

Rowe

2018

Brain and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo provide a systematic overview of the factors that influence how a person adapts to visual field loss following stroke.MethodA systematic review was undertaken (data search period 1861–2016) inclusive of systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, cohort studies, observational studies, and case controlled studies. Studies including adult subjects with hemifield visual field loss, which occured as a direct consequence of stroke, were included. Search terms included a range of MESH terms as well as alternative terms relating to stroke, visual field loss, visual functions, visual perception, and adaptation. Articles were selected by two authors independently, and data were extracted by one author, being verified by the second. All included articles were assessed for risk of bias and quality using checklists appropriate to the study design.ResultsForty‐seven articles (2,900 participants) were included in the overall review, categorized into two sections. Section one included seventeen studies where the reviewers were able to identify a factor they considered as likely to be important for the process of adaptation to poststroke visual field loss. Section two included thirty studies detailing interventions for visual field loss that the reviewers deemed likely to have an influence on the adaptation process. There were no studies identified which specifically investigated and summarized the factors that influence how a person adapts to visual field loss following stroke.ConclusionThere is a substantial amount of evidence that patients can be supported to compensate and adapt to visual field loss following stroke using a range of strategies and methods. However, this systematic review highlights the fact that many unanswered questions in the area of adaptation to visual field loss remain. Further research is required on strategies and methods to improve adaptation to aid clinicians in supporting these patients along their rehabilitation journey.

show abstract

“…Os procedimentos adotados para Revisão Sistemática de Literatura foram baseados nos procedimentos empregados por Kitchenham et al (2009), Khan et al (2003) e Muianga, Granja e Ruiz (2015). As etapas definidas para Revisão Sistemática de Literatura, estão apresentadas na Figura 1.…”

Section: Métodounclassified

“…A primeira etapa refere-se à definição das questões de pesquisa que orientarão a revisão, que devem ser especificados sob a forma de perguntas claras, inequívocas e estruturadas (KHAN et al, 2003).…”

Section: Métodounclassified

Percepção de valor na habitação: uma revisão sistemática de literatura

Setei

Fontanini

Granja

et al. 2018

PARC Pesq. em Arquit. e Constr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoAs pesquisas de análise de valor têm sua contribuição ao proporcionarem conhecimento do que é o valor percebido pelo usuário. Esse conhecimento pode contribuir para o desenvolvimento de habitações mais atraentes aos compradores. Conhecer as preferências e necessidades dos usuários também possibilita a definição de requisitos de projetos mais adequados e alinhados às expectativas dos moradores. Neste artigo propõe-se uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura (RSL) sobre percepção de valor de usuários de edifícios habitacionais, com o objetivo de identificar estudos de interesse e classificá-los em grupos temáticos. Os procedimentos metodológicos consistiram basicamente na busca, seleção e avaliação dos resultados obtidos em seis bases de dados. Como resultado, obteve-se vinte e três artigos de periódico que foram associados a quatro grupos temáticos distintos. Os estudos obtidos evidenciaram o caráter diversificado das pesquisas relacionadas à percepção dos usuários, devido à variedade de situações, métodos e particularidades considerados em cada pesquisa. Por isso, a distribuição dos artigos nos grupos temáticos permitiu a identificação de tendências e padrões que podem orientar o desenvolvimento de pesquisas futuras e proporcionar uma visão do atual estágio de desenvolvimento das pesquisas nessa temática. Os artigos obtidos destacaram a importância da etapa de retroalimentação do processo de projeto de habitações, para que os requisitos dos usuários sejam efetivamente compreendidos e incorporados aos empreendimentos habitacionais.Palavras-chave: Percepção. Valor. Habitação. Abstract Value analysis research has its contribution by providing knowledge of what is the value perceived by the user. This knowledge can contribute to the development of more attractive housing for buyers. Knowing the preferences and needs of users also allows the definition of project requirements to be satisfactory and aligned with the expectations of the residents. This paper proposes a Systematic Review of Literature (RSL) on the value perception of residential buildings users, with the objective of identifying studies of interest and classifying them in thematic groups

show abstract

Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review

Cited by 1,049 publications

References 1 publication

What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability

What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability

Adaptation to poststroke visual field loss: A systematic review

Percepção de valor na habitação: uma revisão sistemática de literatura

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About