2017
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flat Panel Angiography in the Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Temporal Bone: Assessment of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Compared with a 64-Section Multisection CT Scanner

Abstract: Flat panel angiography shows strengths and weaknesses compared with multisection CT. It is more susceptible to artifacts, but due to the higher spatial resolution, it shows equal or higher image quality in assessing some bony structures of diagnostic interest. The lower radiation dose is an additional advantage of flat panel angiography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with Rathgeb et al, who was among the first to evaluate a good clinical observer variability of the planning software [27]. FpVCT without secondary reconstruction is considered a precise method for assessing the parameters of the inner ear with the same or even less radiation dose than conventional methods [18,19]. This might reduce the risk of radiogenic damage in the long term [36,37] while increasing diagnostic image quality [18,19,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with Rathgeb et al, who was among the first to evaluate a good clinical observer variability of the planning software [27]. FpVCT without secondary reconstruction is considered a precise method for assessing the parameters of the inner ear with the same or even less radiation dose than conventional methods [18,19]. This might reduce the risk of radiogenic damage in the long term [36,37] while increasing diagnostic image quality [18,19,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The first application of fpVCT in patients revealed a proper resolution regarding the critical structures for cochlear implantation [17]. Other studies first showed a significantly higher overall image quality compared to MSCT and a reduction of the effective dose of approximately 40% compared to 64-section- [18] and 128-section-MSCT [19]. Further advantages of fpVCT are portability-enabling the intraoperative use and reduced metallic artifacts, allowing postoperative position analyses, and more accurate frequency mapping of the electrode contacts [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multisection computed-tomography (MSCT) is the traditional technique of choice when cholesteatoma is clinically suspected, providing a spatial resolution of 0.4 x 0.4 mm in plane and 0.5 mm in slice thickness. In the last years the use of flat-panel CT (FPCT) has taken place in clinical practice, being preferred for its higher spatial resolution and lower radiation dose 910 . Typically, PBC appears as an expansive soft-tissue mass in the apical portion of the petrous bone, with large areas of bone reabsorption (Fig.…”
Section: Advancements and Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) offers a low-radiation and cost-effective alternative to conventional CT, while also being superior in visualizing highdensity structures, such as the temporal bone [9]. CBCT provides a reduction of the effective dose of up to 40% of a 64-slice CT [10] and comparable radiation dose to a 128slice CT, but with higher image quality compared to both due to the higher spatial resolution [11,13]. The advantages in the visualization of CI electrodes result from their low susceptibility to metallic artifacts [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%