2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2021-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexion and extension laxity after medial, mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between a spacer- and a tension-guided technique

Abstract: The tensor-guided system resulted in significantly more valgus laxity in flexion compared with the spacer-guided system. However, in extension, the situation was reversed: the tension-guided system resulted in less valgus laxity than the spacer-guided system. Clinically, there were no differences between the groups. The valgus laxity found with the spacer-guided system better approximates the valgus laxity values of the healthy elderly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the spacer-guided system is reported to approximate valgus laxity. 32 Furthermore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between JLE and the change of limb alignment, which is not related to the ligament balance. Second, the depth of tibial resection was evaluated radiographically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the spacer-guided system is reported to approximate valgus laxity. 32 Furthermore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between JLE and the change of limb alignment, which is not related to the ligament balance. Second, the depth of tibial resection was evaluated radiographically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue is that the difference between the true thickness of the resected tibial bone and the total thickness of the tibial implant and polyethylene insert may have affected the tension and alignment. However, the spacer guided system is reported to approximate the valgus laxity well [35], and we believe that the technique of cutting the tibia first, positioning the femoral and tibial components parallel and adjusting the gap is more accurate in aligning the knee than the technique using a femoral intramedullary guide that resects the femur and tibia independently. This is supported by the data showing that the postoperative alignment consistently exhibited slight undercorrection (approximately 2° varus) from the valgus stress alignment in almost all cases and showed a strong correlation with that observed on the stress radiographs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these methods, researchers have shown differences in valgus laxity for patients receiving unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via different techniques [21], differences in laxity when stress tests are performed under anesthesia [23], the increase in medial gapping with simulated MCL injury [24, 27], and improvement with MCL repair [25]. However, despite these successes, some limitations of the approach remain, most notably that fluoroscopy exposes patients to ionizing radiation, which, even in low doses, can increase the risk for cancer [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%