FlexRay networks for SAE benchamrk application using DDS middleware: Development of FlexRay driver and its Simulink Blockset implementation

Abdellaoui, Zouhaira; Bouhouch, Rim; Jaouaini, Houda; Hasnaoui, Salem

doi:10.1109/wswan.2015.7210296

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Abdellaoui Z. et al [26] focused on the development of FlexRay drivers and Simulink Block set implementations to validate performance and design, and to provide innovative capabilities for today and tomorrow to distributed systems in automotive applications. The proposed block set is dedicated for the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) application.…”

Section: Vehicle Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Design of a Lightweight In-Vehicle Edge Gateway for the Self-Diagnosis of an Autonomous Vehicle

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a Lightweight In-Vehicle Edge Gateway (LI-VEG) for the self-diagnosis of an autonomous vehicle, which supports a rapid and accurate communication between in-vehicle sensors and a self-diagnosis module and between in-vehicle protocols. A paper on the self-diagnosis module has been published previously, thus this paper only covers the LI-VEG, not the self-diagnosis. The LI-VEG consists of an In-Vehicle Sending and Receiving Layer (InV-SRL), an InV-Management Layer (InV-ML) and an InV-Data Translator Layer (InV-DTL). First, the InV-SRL receives the messages from FlexRay, Control Area Network (CAN), Media Oriented Systems Transport (MOST), and Ethernet and transfers the received messages to the InV-ML. Second, the InV-ML manages the message transmission and reception of FlexRay, CAN, MOST, and Ethernet and an Address Mapping Table. Third, the InV-DTL decomposes the message of FlexRay, CAN, MOST, and Ethernet and recomposes the decomposed messages to the frame suitable for a destination protocol. The performance analysis of the LI-VEG shows that the transmission delay time about message translation and transmission is reduced by an average of 10.83% and the transmission delay time caused by traffic overhead is improved by an average of 0.95%. Therefore, the LI-VEG has higher compatibility and is more cost effective because it applies a software gateway to the OBD, compared to a hardware gateway. In addition, it can reduce the transmission error and overhead caused by message decomposition because of a lightweight message header.

show abstract

Section: Vehicle Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%