AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-1634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight Testing and Preliminary Analysis for Global System Identification of Ornithopter Dynamics Using On-board and Off-board Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Flight tests were intended for identification of the longitudinal dynamics, and involved elevator input signals, executed by the autopilot when triggered by the pilot. 34 The hardware and flight test setup, data processing and sensor fusion process are described in more detail in Refs. 35 and 34 -the basic process was analogous for this study, however new tests were conducted involving a larger number of manoeuvres, and incorporating minor practical improvements based on the previous flight test campaigns.…”
Section: Iib Flight Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 Flight tests were intended for identification of the longitudinal dynamics, and involved elevator input signals, executed by the autopilot when triggered by the pilot. 34 The hardware and flight test setup, data processing and sensor fusion process are described in more detail in Refs. 35 and 34 -the basic process was analogous for this study, however new tests were conducted involving a larger number of manoeuvres, and incorporating minor practical improvements based on the previous flight test campaigns.…”
Section: Iib Flight Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 and 34 -the basic process was analogous for this study, however new tests were conducted involving a larger number of manoeuvres, and incorporating minor practical improvements based on the previous flight test campaigns. 35,34…”
Section: Iib Flight Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be easily programmed and executed, are relatively rapid, can be used to excite several axes simultaneously if applied to different actuators in sequence, and can be tailored to the system and setup with relative ease, even when the dynamics are not yet well known. Through extensive flight testing we found such signals to provide suitable excitation, while presenting fewer challenges than frequency seep [17], [20].…”
Section: A Identification Maneuvers/ Input Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many studies, sub-flap cycle effects are neglected when dealing with the dynamics: in this case, the flapping-related oscillations can be considered a disturbance, which may lead to a low signal-to-noise ratio and adversely affect the identification process. Such oscillations may be significant and the effect may have to be countered using additional low-pass filtering [17], [20] or larger than usual input signals [20] -the former is preferable when linear models are used, as the latter may conflict with possible linearity requirements.…”
Section: A Identification Maneuvers/ Input Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation