2015
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.20.7.075003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence microscopy point spread function model accounting for aberrations due to refractive index variability within a specimen

Abstract: Abstract. A three-dimensional (3-D) point spread function (PSF) model for wide-field fluorescence microscopy, suitable for imaging samples with variable refractive index (RI) in multilayered media, is presented. This PSF model is a key component for accurate 3-D image restoration of thick biological samples, such as lung tissue. Microscope-and specimen-derived parameters are combined with a rigorous vectorial formulation to obtain a new PSF model that accounts for additional aberrations due to specimen RI vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An extensive body of work has explored, mostly at the theoretical level, the aberrations introduced by variations in RI along the microscope's optical path, such as when thin tissue slices are mounted on microscope slides [4][5][6][7]. More recently, attention has shifted to methods of correcting such aberrations [8,24] and to higher-order aberrations due to RI inhomogeneities within biological samples [25]. The current renaissance in the field of tissue clearing, motivated by an interest in viewing deep while preserving fluorescence [2,[26][27][28][29], has further aggravated the impact of aberrations due to a combination of high RI clearing solutions and great imaging depth (up to several mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive body of work has explored, mostly at the theoretical level, the aberrations introduced by variations in RI along the microscope's optical path, such as when thin tissue slices are mounted on microscope slides [4][5][6][7]. More recently, attention has shifted to methods of correcting such aberrations [8,24] and to higher-order aberrations due to RI inhomogeneities within biological samples [25]. The current renaissance in the field of tissue clearing, motivated by an interest in viewing deep while preserving fluorescence [2,[26][27][28][29], has further aggravated the impact of aberrations due to a combination of high RI clearing solutions and great imaging depth (up to several mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity in the sample can be expressed by the sum of all the nonoverlapping blocks as Eight SV-PSFs associated with each block (one for each block vertex location) are computed using the N-interface PSF model, 32 which models light propagation through N stratified layers within a block. SV-PSFs are calculated at discrete locations, ðx o ; y o ; z o Þ ¼ ðX m ; Y n ; Z k Þ, marking block vertices, using imaging conditions including thickness and RI of the sample at these unique locations.…”
Section: Block-based Forward Imaging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four integrated goals that need to be achieved in order to obtain the solution of this challenging imaging problem. These goals are the successful development of (1) a methodology to derive the sample RI distribution; (2) an accurate but practical PSF model that accounts for specimen RI variability, which we reported elsewhere; 32 (3) a computationally tractable SV forward imaging model; 23,33 and (4) a practical restoration algorithm based on the SV model. The determination of the sample RI map is a challenging problem that has been tackled by several groups [34][35][36][37][38] including ours, 39,40 and it is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, this shows that estimators obtained via the sampling theory can be sufficient to provide useful information about precision and resolution. This highlights the importance of the estimation methods and the selection of an adequate image formation model for localization and deconvolution applications [16,17,37].…”
Section: Gibson and Lanni Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%