2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0352(01)00039-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and competing processes in donor–acceptor substituted DNA strands: a comparative study of ensemble and single-molecule data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
163
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
14
163
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FRET D-lifetime measurements, presented in this study, were performed for optimal labeling conditions (ideally each D has an A). Given this, we were able to distinguish also low FRET efficiencies from each other ( 19 , we did not observe dimerization (no shift in the absorption and emission spectra of the fluorophores bound to dsDNA). However, in the FCS measurements, we did observe a strongly reduced molecular brightness of A for the 10 ∆bp sample in comparison to the 15 ∆bp sample.…”
Section: Fret Efficiencies Determined By D-lifetime Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The FRET D-lifetime measurements, presented in this study, were performed for optimal labeling conditions (ideally each D has an A). Given this, we were able to distinguish also low FRET efficiencies from each other ( 19 , we did not observe dimerization (no shift in the absorption and emission spectra of the fluorophores bound to dsDNA). However, in the FCS measurements, we did observe a strongly reduced molecular brightness of A for the 10 ∆bp sample in comparison to the 15 ∆bp sample.…”
Section: Fret Efficiencies Determined By D-lifetime Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although the fluorescent probes are anchored to the bases by a linker with a flexible component, the model-derived and experimental distances are in remarkable agreement (17,18,44).…”
Section: Structural Support For the Initially-bound Complex Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Coupling of fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate (FITC) with these primary amines to form a thiourea linkage then provides FRET donors at various positions, for measurement of a progression of donor-acceptor distances. The strands are designed such that the nearest guanine base is at least 6 base pairs away from the TAMRA label to avoid quenching of TAMRA by guanine (17). All constructs are fully duplex and have the same DNA sequence and length.…”
Section: Distance Measurements By Dna-to-dna Fretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensitive tool for monitoring the assembly of macromolecules and their kinetics is fluorescence microscopy, by virtue of imaging the dynamics of fluorescent dyes attached to the molecules of interest. Recently, fluorescent imaging techniques have been developed for individual molecules, allowing the monitoring of molecular interactions at the single molecule level (Blanchard et al 2004;Coban et al 2006;Deniz et al 1999;Dietrich et al 2002;Friedman et al 2006;Gell et al 2006;Ha 2001Ha , 2004Merchant et al 2007;Murphy et al 2004;Myong et al 2006;Rueda et al 2004;Yasuda et al 2003). These new techniques provide unique information about the natural heterogeneity (structural and dynamics) of individual macromolecules, and allow the analysis of interactions between the molecules, the dynamics of complex formation, determination of the stoichiometry of the complex and calculation of the spatial distance between specific molecules in a complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, the information about inter-dye distance is extracted from FRET efficiency histograms which are often approximated by a Gaussian function (Agrawal et al 2008;Coban et al 2006;Deniz et al 1999;Dietrich et al 2002;Ha 2001;Iqbal et al 2008a; Kapanidis et al 2004;Koopmans et al 2007; Kuzmenkina et al 2006;Lee et al 2005;Merchant et al 2007;Murphy et al 2004;Nir et al 2006;Sabanayagam et al 2005;Schuler et al 2005;Sugawa et al 2007;Yildiz and Selvin 2005;Yim et al 2005;Zhang et al 2007). The apparent width of thus extracted histograms is usually in the range of 0.07-0.2 (on a scale of 0-1) and often ascribed to variations of the interdye distance (Coban et al 2006;Dietrich et al 2002;Merchant et al 2007;Schuler et al 2005;Sugawa et al 2007). Here we describe an approach to discern the contributions of various factors to the apparent width of FRET distribution, showing that photon shot noise and modulations of orientation factor due to helix flexibilities are the main sources for the experimentally observed width of the FRET distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%