1991
DOI: 10.1063/1.105660
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux focusing effects in planar thin-film grain-boundary Josephson junctions

Abstract: We have studied the magnetic interference of the critical currents of synthetic planar thin-film grain-boundary Josephson junctions. We find that the effective area of these junctions scales as the square of the width w in contrast to the usual w(2λ+d) dependence of sandwich-type Josephson junctions. This behavior is a simple consequence of the magnetic response of thin-film superconductors to perpendicular applied fields. A model based on the London theory yields the observed behavior. In addition, we find th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
72
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
13
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the magnetic pattern [ Fig. 3(b)] we get that the distance between two side lobes B ∼ 1 mT is in good agreement with the predicted value B ∼ 1.84 0 /w 2 for thin-film planar junctions [24] considering w ∼ 2 μm.…”
Section: Transport Measurements and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…From the magnetic pattern [ Fig. 3(b)] we get that the distance between two side lobes B ∼ 1 mT is in good agreement with the predicted value B ∼ 1.84 0 /w 2 for thin-film planar junctions [24] considering w ∼ 2 μm.…”
Section: Transport Measurements and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…From the distance of the minima in this dependence we can conclude that the magnetic field penetrates the GBJ as expected. Furthermore, the magnetic field penetrating the grain boundary is enhanced by a factor of order W/d due to flux focusing effects [103]. Here, W is the width of the GBJ and d the thickness of the junction electrodes.…”
Section: Andreev Bound States In D-wave Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the pseudo period of 1-3 Oe corresponds to a much larger effective area S R eff 9 µm 2 than the weak link itself. We have calculated numerically the magnetic field profile for contacts in the thin film limit, following Rosenthal et al 26 , by solving the London equation, ∇ 2 J s − λ −2 J s = 0 in a quasi 2D contact. A color map of the penetration of the field in the contacts appears in Fig.…”
Section: Fraunhofer Pattern Of the Josephson Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By ignoring details of the microscopic vortex structure and dynamics, a macroscopic approach to the diamagnetic screening currents, based on the solution of the London equation in a quasi 2D contact, can reasonably account for the measured pattern if flux focusing effects are assumed in the planar thin- film weak link 26 . Sections VII and Section VIII contain a detailed summary and the conclusions, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%