2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.106026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follicular dynamics, estrous response and pregnancy rate following GnRH and progesterone priming with or without eCG during non-breeding season in anestrous Beetal goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For breeding purposes, goats in standing oestrus were placed at random with one of six sexually active/fertile bucks with the goat to buck ratio being 1:7. Based on the findings of Hameed et al (2020), the mean interval of onset of oestrus after CIDR removal was 33.2 ± 2.0 and 57.0 ± 4.2 h in eCG and non-eCG-treated goats; therefore, the interval from CIDR removal to breeding was 72 h in the current experiment. The rationale for having 72 h breeding window (day −3 to 0) was to provide opportunity to all goats for the exhibition of oestrus and breeding in the presence of bucks.…”
Section: Experimental Design Oestrous Response and Natural Breedingmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For breeding purposes, goats in standing oestrus were placed at random with one of six sexually active/fertile bucks with the goat to buck ratio being 1:7. Based on the findings of Hameed et al (2020), the mean interval of onset of oestrus after CIDR removal was 33.2 ± 2.0 and 57.0 ± 4.2 h in eCG and non-eCG-treated goats; therefore, the interval from CIDR removal to breeding was 72 h in the current experiment. The rationale for having 72 h breeding window (day −3 to 0) was to provide opportunity to all goats for the exhibition of oestrus and breeding in the presence of bucks.…”
Section: Experimental Design Oestrous Response and Natural Breedingmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…A sample size was calculated using the POWER procedure of SAS (SAS/STAT version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.). The calculation was based on Hameed et al (2020), that administration of 400 IU of eCG was pre-ovulatory follicle (6.27 vs. 7.20 vs. 7.31 mm ± 0.07; p < .01) and corpora lutea (6.75 vs. 8.26 vs. 8.07 mm ± 0.42; p = .04) than CON. The mean follicular blood flow did not differ among treatments; however, the mean luteal blood flow was greater in L-eCGtreated goats (0.81 vs. 1.61 vs. 1.07 cm 2 ± 0.12; p = .001).…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations