2013
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follicular flushing and in vitro fertilization outcomes in the poorest responders: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: NCT 01558141.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
45
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
45
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After meta-analysis, we found that the fertilization rate with double-lumen needle were all lower than that with single-lumen needle (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.44 -0.97; I 2 = 0%; Figure 6). Live birth rate Three out of four RCT studies reported the live birth rate (LBR) [12] [13] [14].…”
Section: Fertilization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After meta-analysis, we found that the fertilization rate with double-lumen needle were all lower than that with single-lumen needle (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.44 -0.97; I 2 = 0%; Figure 6). Live birth rate Three out of four RCT studies reported the live birth rate (LBR) [12] [13] [14].…”
Section: Fertilization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LBR were lower in two studies with double-lumen needle than that with singlelumen needle [12] [13]. Only one study showed that the LBR was higher with double-lumen needle [14].…”
Section: Fertilization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, so far randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in unselected ART populations [3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] or poor responder population [14,15] have failed to demonstrate that OR combined with follicular flushing improved the number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, embryo quality or pregnancy rate when compared to OR without follicular flushing [3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. In contrast, in these RCTs the utilization of follicular flushing was associated with an increase in the duration of the procedure [3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] and in the use of anesthetic agents [3,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in these RCTs the utilization of follicular flushing was associated with an increase in the duration of the procedure [3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] and in the use of anesthetic agents [3,11]. However, it is premature to conclude that there is no benefit in follicular flushing [11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mok-Lin et al conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing follicular flushing versus aspiration only in 50 extremely poor responders (≤4 follicles ≥12 mm on the day of hCG administration) [19]. There were no differences in the number of oocytes retrieved (4 vs. 3, p = .41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%