2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follicular size, luteinizing hormone (LH), and progesterone (P4) levels in postpartum Santa Inês ewes subjected to ram effect combined with suckling interruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some management tools can also increment reproductive efficiency. For example, the exposure of the male to the female with temporary weaning for 24 h improved the reproductive performance in ewes under postpartum anestrous ( 54 ). Also, the male effect promotes pre-ovulatory LH peaks up to 80 h after physical contact ( 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some management tools can also increment reproductive efficiency. For example, the exposure of the male to the female with temporary weaning for 24 h improved the reproductive performance in ewes under postpartum anestrous ( 54 ). Also, the male effect promotes pre-ovulatory LH peaks up to 80 h after physical contact ( 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were obtained by Atkinson and Williamson (1985) and Rubianes et al (1997) who observed that, the diameter and number of the larger follicles increased subjected to the presence of the rams with ewes. Moreover, it leads to larger ovulatory follicle size (Ferreira-Silva et al, 2018). It could be deduced that, follicles number and size were higher of ewes in REG compared with the ewes in CG may be due to the presence of the rams.…”
Section: Follicular Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…After ram introduction, follicular growth and development begins immediately, this may be due to the response to the initial in the LH basal levels and pulse frequency (Atkinson and Williamson, 1985). However, the presence of ram with ewes until the ovulation leads to peaks of preovulatory LH in ewes, that acts upon this role of the growth and development of the ovarian follicles (Okamura et al, 2010;Hawken and Martin, 2012;Ferreira-Silva et al, 2017 ab andFerreira-Silva et al, 2018). Table (2) that, the lambing rate was higher (P <0.01) in the REG compared to the CG (97.14 vs 81.43 %).…”
Section: Follicular Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that lactation inhibits the functionality of the reproductive axis (Morales-Terán et al, 2004), temporary or permanent weaning can enhance the response to estrous induction in ewes (Ronquillo et al, 2008;Ferreira-Silva et al, 2018). Other authors, however, did not observe any reproductive advantage of weaning lambs (Ungerfeld & Sánchez-Dávila, 2012;Goff et al, 2014;Orihuela et al, 2016), which is probably related to the strength of the seasonal inhibition of the reproductive axis according to the breed and/or other metabolic and environmental constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%