2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction 2013
DOI: 10.1109/acii.2013.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food and Mood: Just-in-Time Support for Emotional Eating

Abstract: Abstract-Behavior modification in health is difficult, as habitual behaviors are extremely well-learned, by definition. This research is focused on building a persuasive system for behavior modification around emotional eating. In this paper, we make strides towards building a just-in-time support system for emotional eating in three user studies. The first two studies involved participants using a custom mobile phone application for tracking emotions, food, and receiving interventions. We found lots of indivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Personalized settings and the ability to turn off features were considered important across population groups (74,90,93). Personalization of goals and challenges, and feedback based on these, was considered important by overweight and general adult populations (39,41,74,80,88). Similarly, using culturally relevant and favorite foods within games was desirable for low-SES populations (50,79,89) and enabled transfer of learning to real life (85).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Personalized settings and the ability to turn off features were considered important across population groups (74,90,93). Personalization of goals and challenges, and feedback based on these, was considered important by overweight and general adult populations (39,41,74,80,88). Similarly, using culturally relevant and favorite foods within games was desirable for low-SES populations (50,79,89) and enabled transfer of learning to real life (85).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the testing sample varied greatly. The most common size was between 11 and 20 testers (9 studies) (48,72,79,85,86,(88)(89)(90)92), followed by #10 testers (4 studies) (73,76,85,90), 21-50 testers (3 studies) (36,74,77), 51-100 testers (2 studies) (70, 80), 101-200 testers (2 studies) (75,92), and least commonly >200 testers (1 study) (65).…”
Section: Consumer Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations