DOI: 10.53846/goediss-3841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Safety and Quality Standards in the Thai Horticultural Sector

Abstract: GlobalGAP is the most important private standard for producers in the Thai horticultural sector concerning access to high-value markets, especially to Europe. This chapter presents an analysis of GlobalGAP adoption by small-scale fruit and vegetable farmers in Thailand focusing on GlobalGAP group certification, the costs and perceived benefits of GlobalGAP adoption, and the factors influencing standard adoption. In our research area, GlobalGAP group certification has encouraged the formation of new institution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Easy tasks like wildlife management were generally agreed upon (30-50%), while those requiring specific infrastructure were declared difficult (43-50%). Previous research supports these findings; Kersting ( 2013 ) emphasizes the need for new or improved infrastructure for GGAP certification, and John ( 2013 ) highlights the substitutional cost involved. Niemiec and Komorowska ( 2019 ) identified funds as a major barrier, especially for small and poor farmers (Narrod et al , 2009 ; Nicetic et al , 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Easy tasks like wildlife management were generally agreed upon (30-50%), while those requiring specific infrastructure were declared difficult (43-50%). Previous research supports these findings; Kersting ( 2013 ) emphasizes the need for new or improved infrastructure for GGAP certification, and John ( 2013 ) highlights the substitutional cost involved. Niemiec and Komorowska ( 2019 ) identified funds as a major barrier, especially for small and poor farmers (Narrod et al , 2009 ; Nicetic et al , 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%