2004
DOI: 10.1081/drt-200032802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Sorption Isotherms Prediction Using the Ross Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is not completely correct. The values of equilibrium moisture content given by different experimental sorption isotherms reported in the literature show a great discrepancy (Herman et al, 1999;Roman et al, 2004). In this way, it would be of great importance to achieve isotherms obtained through theoretical considerations (Crapiste and Rotstein, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this is not completely correct. The values of equilibrium moisture content given by different experimental sorption isotherms reported in the literature show a great discrepancy (Herman et al, 1999;Roman et al, 2004). In this way, it would be of great importance to achieve isotherms obtained through theoretical considerations (Crapiste and Rotstein, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Different types of concentrated proteins (fish, casein and soybean (Iglesias and Chirife, 1982)) and different starches (potato and cassava (Iglesias and Chirife, 1982)) were taking into account. The literature data were fitted by modified Table 1 Solubility equations of the studied solutes as temperature (°C) function (Roman et al (2004)). …”
Section: Non-soluble Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The agreement of ROSS equation, as proposed by Roman et al (2004) was tested here for some food sorption isotherms (Table 4). Even though this equation was based on thermodynamics aspects, considering the components of food products, the agreement was not so good.…”
Section: Table 3 -Agreement Parameters Of Mathematical Models Of Isotmentioning
confidence: 99%