1983
DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(83)90016-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign investment and spillover efficiency in an underdeveloped economy: Evidence from the Mexican manufacturing industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
222
2
10

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 495 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
222
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…For the China's economy to sustain a high-speed economic development, reform will have to become a long-term policy, whereas international trade can be adjusted to suit for growth and efficiency. Foreign direct investment can have an indirect effect on the domestic economy via positive spillovers and competition (Blomstrom and Persson, 1983). Our finding implies that, even though FDI have an important and positive effect on TE in the China's economy, it should be further encouraged to neutralize the downward trend of the effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For the China's economy to sustain a high-speed economic development, reform will have to become a long-term policy, whereas international trade can be adjusted to suit for growth and efficiency. Foreign direct investment can have an indirect effect on the domestic economy via positive spillovers and competition (Blomstrom and Persson, 1983). Our finding implies that, even though FDI have an important and positive effect on TE in the China's economy, it should be further encouraged to neutralize the downward trend of the effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Using an augmented production function, Caves found that the very presence of foreign firms had a positive impact on labour productivity in the industries studied. Subsequent studies of this type by Globerman [1979] for Canada, by Blomstrom and Persson [1983], Kokko [1994], and Blomstrom and Wolff [1994] for Mexico, by Kokko, Tansini and Zejan [1996] for the Uruguayan manufacturing sector, and by Liu et al [2000] for UK manufacturing, confirm positive productivity spillovers from FDI.…”
Section: Fdi and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several country studies have been carried out, providing diverging results on the role of FDI spillovers with respect to stimulating economic growth. Whereas positive effects from spillovers have been found for, HJ Mexico (Blomström and Persson, 1983;Blomström and Wolff, 1994;Kokko, 1994), Uruguay (Kokko, Tansini, and Zejan, 1996) and Indonesia (Sjöholm, 1999b), no spillovers were traced in studies for Morocco (Haddad and Henderson, 1993) and Venezuela (Aitken and Harrison, 1999). These diverging results may underline the crucial role of certain host country characteristics necessary to let FDI contribute positively to economic growth through spillovers.…”
Section: $%675$and7mentioning
confidence: 99%