Forensic Journals: Bibliometrics and Journal Impact Factors

Jones, Alan Wayne

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800034-2.00181-6

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(22), which could assist researchers in better and more quickly grasping the course, trend, and current hotspots of a specific field. In addition, it can identify reliable researchers and affiliations for cooperation (23). More and more scholars are applying bibliometrics to guide studies, such as in cardiovascular diseases (24), cancer (25), and even during the COVID-19 pandemic (26).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sequencing technology as a major impetus in the advancement of studies into rheumatism: A bibliometric study

Huang

Tang²,

Wang³

et al. 2023

Front. Immunol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundRheumatism covers a wide range of diseases with complex clinical manifestations and places a tremendous burden on humans. For many years, our understanding of rheumatism was seriously hindered by technology constraints. However, the increasing application and rapid advancement of sequencing technology in the past decades have enabled us to study rheumatism with greater accuracy and in more depth. Sequencing technology has made huge contributions to the field and is now an indispensable component and powerful tool in the study of rheumatism.MethodsArticles on sequencing and rheumatism, published from 1 January 2000 to 25 April 2022, were retrieved from the Web of Science™ (Clarivate™, Philadelphia, PA, USA) database. Bibliometrix, the open-source tool, was used for the analysis of publication years, countries, authors, sources, citations, keywords, and co-words.ResultsThe 1,374 articles retrieved came from 62 countries and 350 institutions, with a general increase in article numbers during the last 22 years. The leading countries in terms of publication numbers and active cooperation with other countries were the USA and China. The most prolific authors and most popular documents were identified to establish the historiography of the field. Popular and emerging research topics were assessed by keywords and co-occurrence analysis. Immunological and pathological process in rheumatism, classification, risks and susceptibility, and biomarkers for diagnosis were among the hottest themes for research.ConclusionsSequencing technology has been widely applied in the study of rheumatism and propells research in the area of discovering novel biomarkers, related gene patterns and physiopathology. We suggest that further efforts be made to advance the study of genetic patterns related to rheumatic susceptibility, pathogenesis, classification and disease activity, and novel biomarkers.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sequencing technology as a major impetus in the advancement of studies into rheumatism: A bibliometric study

Huang

Tang²,

Wang³

et al. 2023

Front. Immunol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the time of this publication, there have been no previously published bibliometric or scientometric analyses on the peer-reviewed HT literature to our knowledge. Bibliometrics is a quantitative approach to analyzing a collection of written works [13]. Scientometrics can be considered synonymous with bibliometrics [13] or distinguished by a focus on scientific publications exclusively [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bibliometrics is a quantitative approach to analyzing a collection of written works [13]. Scientometrics can be considered synonymous with bibliometrics [13] or distinguished by a focus on scientific publications exclusively [14]. All the analyses described for the present study are referred to as scientometric.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Review of the Effect of Using High Tunnels on Crop Vigor and Quality

Donovan¹,

Ruiz-Menjivar²,

Coolong³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study assessed the literature about the use of high tunnels (HTs) in agricultural systems in the United States since the 2009 launch of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) High Tunnel Initiative. This NRCS program led to an increase in HT adoption nationwide. The literature searches were conducted using the Web of Science (WoS) database. The final sample was 133 peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and February 2023. We used CiteSpace 6.2.R1 and Gephi 0.9.2 to conduct co-citation, co-author, co-institution, and clustering techniques. The findings showed that the peer-reviewed literature about HT use has increased since 2009, substantially rising between 2017 and 2021. Horticulture was the top subject category in the literature, and most articles were published in peer-reviewed journals of the American Society for Horticultural Science (i.e., HortTechnology and HortScience). The research field evolved from general HT practices, nutrient management, and plant pathology to focus on trials of specific crops and integrated pest management. The institutions with the most contributions to the HT literature were Kansas State University, the University of Florida, Michigan State University, Purdue University, and the University of Minnesota. The patterns of HT research revealed in this study offer a greater understanding of the current state of knowledge to inform the focus of future research.

show abstract

“…For these advantages, h‐index has attracted the attention of researchers and has been widely used for different tasks and contexts, 13–20 including but not limited to the following: (1) to compare the scientific output of researchers; (2) to measure the scientific output of complete research groups, institutions and groups of authors; (3) to evaluate the scientific impact of journals; (4) to study interesting topics and compounds; (5) to evaluate research performance among different countries; and (6) to study the networks among the above‐mentioned units. Many bibliometricians have hailed the h‐index as one of the most successful indicators and a major contribution to the discipline 21,22 . Actually, the h‐index is so popular that it has enjoyed increasing vogue as a decision‐making tool within higher education and scientific research during the last decade 23 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many bibliometricians have hailed the h-index as one of the most successful indicators and a major contribution to the discipline. 21,22 Actually, the h-index is so popular that it has enjoyed increasing vogue as a decision-making tool within higher education and scientific research during the last decade. 23 Although the h-index has achieved great success in the related fields of bibliometrics and informatics, it has been rarely investigated and used in chemometrics.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

H‐type indices with applications in chemometrics I: h‐multiple similarity index

Yang

2021

Journal of Chemometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The h-index was originally proposed to measure the impact of individuals' scientific output, based on their number of publications and citations. In this paper, a variant of h-index was proposed as a multiple similarity measure and its applications in chemometrics were studied. To measure the multiple similarity among a set of variables or objects, both the pairwise similarity and the coverage of high pairwise similarity across variables or objects were considered and measured with the suggested h-multiple similarity index (HMSI). HMSI was defined as: based on the pairwise similarity (between [0,1]) among all objects in a set, if at most M% of all the pairwise similarity values is no less than M%, then the HMSI value of the batch will be M%. For applications, HMSI was used in three chemometrics problems: (1) to compare the stability of marker selection results by different classification models in metabonomics;(2) to measure the batch consistency of herbal high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fingerprints; and (3) to evaluate multivariate calibration models based on cross validation. The results indicate that HMSI is a simple, robust, and effective index to measure multiple similarity and useful in chemometrics applications.Academic influence is an important embodiment of the contribution of scholars, institutions or countries in science and technology. 1 How to evaluate academic influence objectively and fairly has always been one of the important research topics in the field of library and scientific informatics. [2][3][4][5] In the past years, many scholars have devoted themselves to the research of better indicators. [6][7][8] In 2005, a physicist, Professor Hirsch, proposed a new index named h-index to measure the academic influence of scholars. 7 It was defined that in a certain period of time, if the cited frequency of h academic papers published by a scholar is no less than h times and the cited frequency of all the other papers is less than or equal to h times, the h-index of the scholar is h. 7,9

show abstract

Forensic Journals: Bibliometrics and Journal Impact Factors

Cited by 13 publications

References 17 publications

Sequencing technology as a major impetus in the advancement of studies into rheumatism: A bibliometric study

Sequencing technology as a major impetus in the advancement of studies into rheumatism: A bibliometric study

A Scientometric Review of the Effect of Using High Tunnels on Crop Vigor and Quality

H‐type indices with applications in chemometrics I: h‐multiple similarity index

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About