Forensic Science and How Statistics Can Help It

Abstract

The persistent issue of wrongful convictions in the United States emphasizes the need for scrutiny and improvement of the criminal justice system. While statistical methods for the evaluation of forensic evidence, including glass, fingerprints, and deoxyribonucleic acid, have significantly contributed to solving intricate crimes, there is a notable lack of national‐level standards to ensure the appropriate application of statistics in forensic investigations. We discuss the obstacles in the application of statistics in court and emphasize the importance of making statistical interpretation accessible to non‐statisticians, especially those who make decisions about potentially innocent individuals. We investigate the use and misuse of statistical methods in crime investigations, in particular the likelihood ratio approach. We further describe the use of graphical models, where hypotheses and evidence can be represented as nodes connected by arrows signifying association or causality. We emphasize the advantages of special graph structures, such as object‐oriented Bayesian networks and chain event graphs, which allow for the concurrent examination of evidence of various nature.