2019
DOI: 10.1093/jofore/fvz062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Management for Carbon Sequestration and Climate Adaptation

Abstract: The importance of forests for sequestering carbon has created widespread interest among land managers for identifying actions that maintain or enhance carbon storage in forests. Managing for forest carbon under changing climatic conditions underscores a need for resources that help identify adaptation actions that align with carbon management. We developed the Forest Carbon Management Menu to help translate broad carbon management concepts into actionable tactics that help managers reduce risk from expected cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average biomass per part of the tree ranging from the most substantial portion is the stem with a percentage of 50.28%, followed by branches up to 28.00%, then roots 14.26% and the smallest leaves of 7.46%. The equation model for estimating Mindi tree carbon content is Y=246,123 d 1,986 , Mahogany Y=48,389 d 2,443 , Tectona Y=65,019 d 2,370 and Paraserianthes Y = 52,726 d 2,116 . The amount of carbon content in PPHR Lawu Lestari is 2558.69 tons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average biomass per part of the tree ranging from the most substantial portion is the stem with a percentage of 50.28%, followed by branches up to 28.00%, then roots 14.26% and the smallest leaves of 7.46%. The equation model for estimating Mindi tree carbon content is Y=246,123 d 1,986 , Mahogany Y=48,389 d 2,443 , Tectona Y=65,019 d 2,370 and Paraserianthes Y = 52,726 d 2,116 . The amount of carbon content in PPHR Lawu Lestari is 2558.69 tons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of forests to absorb and store Carbon is not the same in natural forests, plantations, brackish forests, swamp forests, and people's forests and dependent on tree species, soil types, and topography. At present, comprehensive data sources on carbon stocks in different kinds of forest ecosystems and other land uses are limited [1]. People's forest is a forest that grows on community land, both in the yard (around the dwelling house), a moor (dry soil commonly planted with crops other than rice), as well as rice fields [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vegetation and the soils covered by them are permanent pools and play a significant role in sequestering atmospheric carbon, thus reducing the effects of climate change (Karki et al 2016). The high capacity of forest ecosystems to decrease greenhouse gas emissions makes carbon management a key component of future natural climate solutions (Fargione et al 2018;Griscom et al 2017;Ontl et al 2020). Forests are good criteria for controlling the carbon value of the atmosphere because they are the most important carbon pools for carbon sequestration (Wegiel and Polowy 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good forest or vegetation area has a lot of benefits, in relation to global warming and climate change issues, namely forests area have the function to reduce CO2 emissions that were released into the atmosphere and then stored in the form of carbon stocks. Ontl et al (2020) stated that managing for forest carbon under changing climatic conditions underscores a need for resources that help identify adaptation actions that align with carbon management. With the management carried out by PT Indonesia Power Kamojang and Perhutani, the Kamojang area can become one of the alternative solutions to environmental problems, such as global warming or climate change in West Java specifically in the southern region that can arise due to increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations through CO2 absorption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%